Price drops in and around Nijmegen
More homes in and around Nijmegen whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
31/07/2026 | Abersland 1715 Wijchen | € 375.000 € 365.000 | -2.7% | 79 m²128 m² | |||
31/07/2026 | Kastelein 19 Wijchen | € 675.000 € 645.000 | -4.4% | 140 m²196 m² | |||
31/07/2026 | Schependomlaan 53 Nijmegen | € 975.000 € 925.000 | -5.1% | 156 m²473 m² | |||
30/07/2026 | Eilbrachtstraat 6 Nijmegen | € 375.000 € 325.000 | -13.3% | 63 m² | |||
29/07/2026 | Vlietberg 6 Ooij | € 575.000 € 450.000 | -21.7% | 124 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Kraaijenberg 7421 Wijchen | € 469.500 € 445.000 | -5.2% | 102 m²288 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Wolfskuilseweg 16 Nijmegen | € 400.000 € 395.000 | -1.3% | 90 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Klinkerstraat 3 Grave | € 435.000 € 400.000 | -8.1% | 131 m²65 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Meander 85 Bemmel | € 499.500 € 487.500 | -2.4% | 125 m²140 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Staringstraat 7 Nijmegen | € 240.000 € 225.000 | -6.3% | 29 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | Knarrenhof 19 Velp (NB) | € 670.000 € 645.000 | -3.7% | 102 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | Knarrenhof 10 Velp (NB) | € 520.000 € 497.500 | -4.3% | 86 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | Knarrenhof 11 Velp (NB) | € 465.000 € 442.500 | -4.8% | 74 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | Knarrenhof 13 Velp (NB) | € 490.000 € 465.000 | -5.1% | 76 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | Oude Groenestraat 6 17 Oosterhout (GE) | € 446.000 € 425.000 | -4.7% | 51 m²285 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | van Slichtenhorststraat 51 Nijmegen | € 225.000 € 215.000 | -4.4% | 26 m² | |||
13/07/2026 | Woeziksestraat 615 Wijchen | € 425.000 € 395.000 | -7.1% | 1130 m² | |||
11/07/2026 | Eikstraat 5 Beek (Gem. Berg en Dal) | € 450.000 € 425.000 | -5.6% | 93 m²153 m² | |||
10/07/2026 | 't Slotje 59 Wijchen | € 395.000 € 365.000 | -7.6% | 78 m² | |||
10/07/2026 | Treubstraat 96 Nijmegen | € 450.000 € 419.000 | -6.9% | 84 m²245 m² |
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the underlying data and figures are indicative and may be incomplete, outdated or incorrect; no rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Jan de Wittstraat 6
Apartment at Jan de Wittstraat 6 in Nijmegen (Bottendaal neighbourhood). The home was built in 1897 and has 595 m² of living space, 1 bedroom and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Nijmegen (421 m). The nearest primary school is Vrijeschool Meander (565 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted31 Jul 2026€ 195,000−€ 25,000
- Sold6 Jun 2026€ 220,000
Property details
- Living area
- 595 m²
- Construction year
- 1897
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 1
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 2,196,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Bottendaal, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- Low share renewable0%
- Share of households lowest 40% incomeⓘ
- strong concentration of low incomes70.7%
- Residents in 100m grid cellⓘ
- Very densely populated155 persons
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safetyⓘ
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.1673 score
- High stress (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Much stress28.1%
- Catering within 300 mⓘ
- Very many catering businesses, nightlife area21
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)82.8%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby17
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 kmⓘ
- Much industry nearby11
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)ⓘ
- Above the standardYes
- Urban heat island effectⓘ
- Strong heat island2.1 °C
- Can find cooling outside the homeⓘ
- Few people find cooling outside31.8%
- Able to find cooling in the propertyⓘ
- Few people can cool off indoors30.8%
- Shared plotⓘ
- Shared plotYes
- Fine dust (PM2.5)ⓘ
- Elevated10.2 µg/m³
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- Elevated2%
- PFAS standard breach within 10 kmⓘ
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Masts within 300 mⓘ
- Multiple transmission masts4
- Proportion of flexible employment contractsⓘ
- Much flexible work54.7%· NL 27%
- Distance to nearest asylum reception centreⓘ
- Nearby (<1 km)487 m
- Distance to planned asylum accommodationⓘ
- Nearby (<1 km)908 m
- Paid parkingⓘ
- Paid parkingYes
- Central lottery for primary school in municipalityⓘ
- Municipality with central primary school ballotYes
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)ⓘ
- Very generous plot2,410 m²
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values10.1%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂ⓘ
- Very low0.63 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facilityⓘ
- Far away17.5 km
- Distance to biomass plantⓘ
- At distance (>3 km)9.7 km
- Distance to nearest emission sourceⓘ
- ample distance1 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbineⓘ
- Far away (>2 km)2.6 km
- Distance to military terrainⓘ
- Well away from military terrain15.3 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
4 permits within 500 m · 17 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
74th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 449 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
61st percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 211 pupils
Disadvantage score 6: more disadvantage than 32% of schools
20th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 190 pupils
Disadvantage score 35: more disadvantage than 75% of schools
87th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 224 pupils
Disadvantage score 0: more disadvantage than 8% of schools
75th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 231 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
60th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 315 pupils
Disadvantage score 53: more disadvantage than 86% of schools
18th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 226 pupils
Disadvantage score 13: more disadvantage than 49% of schools
88th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 61 pupils · total 395 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
100th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 212 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
89th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 224 pupils
Disadvantage score 14: more disadvantage than 50% of schools
62nd percentile: average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.6 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 135 exam candidates
81st percentile: high · 92% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VWO · 154 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO
21st percentile: low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 54 exam candidates
69th percentile: average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 113 exam candidates
53rd percentile: average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 167 exam candidates
26th percentile: average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 245 exam candidates
77th percentile: high · 96% passed · CE avg 6.6 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 352 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
51st percentile: average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 262 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.