Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Jan Evertsenstraat 669
Apartment at Jan Evertsenstraat 669 in Amsterdam (Overtoomse Veld-Noord neighbourhood). The home was built in 2008 and has 91 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A+. The nearest railway station is Jan van Galenstraat (362 m). The nearest primary school is Islamitische Basisschool El Kadisia (293 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced30 Jun 2026€ 575,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 600,000
Property details
- Living area
- 91 m²
- Construction year
- 2008
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A+
- WOZ value
- € 628,000
- Ownership
- Municipal leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Overtoomse Veld-Noord, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance9%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby24
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside38%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors37.4%
- Aircraft movements per hour (nearest airport)
- Very busy54.1 per hour
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated290 persons
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safety
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.137 score
- Leasehold or freehold
- FreeholdNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot2,950 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions19 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)98 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA+
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical400 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.67 µg/m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
4 permits · 2 construction plans within 500 m · 42 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
59th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 64 pupils · total 667 pupils
Disadvantage score 52 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
15th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 338 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
3rd percentile — low · DIA · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 161 pupils
Disadvantage score 58 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
2nd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 199 pupils
Disadvantage score 46 — more disadvantage than 83% of schools
6th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 292 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
70th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 52 pupils · total 464 pupils
Disadvantage score 54 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
38th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 295 pupils
Disadvantage score 58 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
34th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 489 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
no recent test score · total 38 pupils
Disadvantage score 4 — more disadvantage than 24% of schools
13th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 245 pupils
Disadvantage score 65 — more disadvantage than 91% of schools
0th percentile — low · 59% passed · CE avg 5.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 29 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
35th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO/PRO · 93 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 52% passed · CE avg 5.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 33 exam candidates
5th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 138 exam candidates
56th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 97 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
66th percentile — average · 97% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 68 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.