Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
25/07/2026 | Statenlaan 146 Den Haag | € 700.000 € 650.000 | -7.1% | 163 m² | |||
25/07/2026 | Juliana van Stolberglaan 372 Den Haag | € 425.000 € 400.000 | -5.9% | 83 m² | |||
25/07/2026 | Brabantse Turfmarkt 26 Delft | € 895.000 € 845.000 | -5.6% | 194 m² | |||
25/07/2026 | Vlamingstraat 36 B Den Haag | € 399.500 € 375.000 | -6.1% | 72 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Westduinweg 54 A Den Haag | € 435.000 € 395.000 | -9.2% | 81 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Van Alkemadelaan 70 Den Haag | € 1.245.000 € 1.190.000 | -4.4% | 233 m²191 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Zwetstraat 60 Den Haag | € 260.000 € 250.000 | -3.9% | 50 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Thomsonlaan 206 Den Haag | € 550.000 € 495.000 | -10.0% | 122 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Rijswijkseweg 71 C Den Haag | € 369.000 € 349.000 | -5.4% | 94 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Zwartendijk 29 Monster | € 1.129.000 € 1.095.000 | -3.0% | 236 m²1015 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Pisuissestraat 75 Den Haag | € 420.000 € 400.000 | -4.8% | 112 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Louis Couperusplein 52 Den Haag | € 840.000 € 829.500 | -1.3% | 153 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Volmerlaan 4 F035 Rijswijk (ZH) | € 309.500 € 300.000 | -3.1% | 53 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Kerkweg 14 Pijnacker | € 400.000 € 379.000 | -5.3% | 103 m²182 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Mient 138 Den Haag | € 325.000 € 300.000 | -7.7% | 70 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Erasmusweg 1903 Den Haag | € 550.000 € 500.000 | -9.1% | 156 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Kaapstraat 80 Den Haag | € 285.000 € 275.000 | -3.5% | 82 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Buizerdlaan 213 Leidschendam | € 525.000 € 499.000 | -5.0% | 83 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Segbroeklaan 10 Den Haag | € 425.000 € 400.000 | -5.9% | 109 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Tollenspark 15 's-Gravenzande | € 770.000 € 750.000 | -2.6% | 156 m²213 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Juliana van Stolberglaan 372
Apartment at Juliana van Stolberglaan 372 in 's-Gravenhage (Bezuidenhout-Oost neighbourhood). The home was built in 1931 and has 82 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Den Haag Laan van NOI (622 m). The nearest primary school is Nutsbasisschool Bezuidenhout (455 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced25 Jul 2026€ 400,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale27 May 2026€ 425,000
Property details
- Living area
- 82 m²
- Construction year
- 1931
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 375,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Bezuidenhout-Oost, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- Low share renewable0%
- Residents in 100m grid cellⓘ
- Very densely populated220 persons
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)85.6%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)87%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)ⓘ
- Much building pressure52
- Permits <500 m (3 months)ⓘ
- Very high construction activity12
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress47 °C
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Industrial emitters within 2 kmⓘ
- Much industry nearby8
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)ⓘ
- Above the standardYes
- Able to find cooling in the propertyⓘ
- Few people can cool off indoors37.5%
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)ⓘ
- Deep (0.5–2 m)0.93 m
- Flood risk classⓘ
- High flood risklarge
- Shared plotⓘ
- Shared plotYes
- Share of homes with solar powerⓘ
- Few solar panels6%
- Distance to military terrainⓘ
- Near military site0.8 km
- Distance to railway lineⓘ
- Close to railway298 m
- Within Wbb soil locationⓘ
- Within registered soil locationYes
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Above-average nuisance6.6%
- Noise loadⓘ
- Heavy63 dB
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)ⓘ
- Disturbing54 dB
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Multiple industrial businesses5
- PFAS standard breach within 10 kmⓘ
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values6.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂ⓘ
- Very low0.865 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facilityⓘ
- Far away40.2 km
- Distance to biomass plantⓘ
- At distance (>3 km)46.5 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbineⓘ
- Far away (>2 km)3.2 km
- Distance to sprayed cropⓘ
- Far away (>250 m)1 km
- Distance to nearest high-voltage power lineⓘ
- Far from high voltage426 m
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
48 permits within 500 m · 25 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
92nd percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 49 pupils · total 401 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
53rd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 163 pupils
Disadvantage score 11: more disadvantage than 45% of schools
80th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 50 pupils · total 419 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
52nd percentile: average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 191 pupils
Disadvantage score 53: more disadvantage than 86% of schools
44th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 180 pupils
Disadvantage score 31: more disadvantage than 72% of schools
16th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 221 pupils
Disadvantage score 31: more disadvantage than 72% of schools
32nd percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 503 pupils
Disadvantage score 83: more disadvantage than 96% of schools
29th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 196 pupils
Disadvantage score 56: more disadvantage than 88% of schools
9th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 14 pupils · total 171 pupils
Disadvantage score 40: more disadvantage than 79% of schools
77th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 59 pupils · total 455 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
95th percentile: high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 71 exam candidates
52nd percentile: average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.5 · HAVO/VWO · 136 exam candidates
98th percentile: high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VBO/MAVO · 59 exam candidates
71st percentile: average · 98% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 84 exam candidates
12th percentile: low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/PRO · 79 exam candidates
68th percentile: average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.6 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 233 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
72nd percentile: average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VWO · 109 exam candidates
61st percentile: average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 69 exam candidates
61st percentile: average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.6 · HAVO/VWO · 175 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.