Price drops in and around Utrecht
More homes in and around Utrecht whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Jungfrau 11
Apartment at Jungfrau 11 in Utrecht (Lunetten-Zuid neighbourhood). The home was built in 1984 and has 59 m² of living space, 1 bedroom and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Utrecht Lunetten (1 km). The nearest primary school is Op Avontuur (415 m).
Price & status history
- Under offer14 Jul 2026
- Price reduced24 Jun 2026€ 325,000−€ 50,500
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 375,500
Property details
- Living area
- 59 m²
- Construction year
- 1984
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 1
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 349,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Lunetten-Zuid, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby9
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside42.8%
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away5.4 km
- Children per primary school place (proxy)
- Many children per place2.44 ratio
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)85.7%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)86.2%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot546 m²
- Share of homes with solar power
- Above average31%
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)170 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalB
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical700 m³
- Housing market throughput (sales per year)
- High throughput3.55%
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
1 permit within 500 m · 50 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
66th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 14 pupils · total 136 pupils
Disadvantage score 5 — more disadvantage than 29% of schools
83rd percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 383 pupils
Disadvantage score 3 — more disadvantage than 21% of schools
71st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 250 pupils
Disadvantage score 0 — more disadvantage than 3% of schools
68th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 219 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
98th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 215 pupils
Disadvantage score 6 — more disadvantage than 31% of schools
85th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 312 pupils
Disadvantage score 9 — more disadvantage than 38% of schools
19th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 115 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 78% of schools
100th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 183 pupils
Disadvantage score 34 — more disadvantage than 75% of schools
17th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 8 pupils · total 106 pupils
Disadvantage score 21 — more disadvantage than 60% of schools
13th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 74 pupils
Disadvantage score 13 — more disadvantage than 48% of schools
92nd percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 175 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
8th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 274 exam candidates
88th percentile — high · 95% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VWO · 172 exam candidates
14th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 270 exam candidates
73rd percentile — average · 98% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 160 exam candidates
1st percentile — low · 79% passed · CE avg 5.6 · HAVO · 14 exam candidates
92nd percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.6 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 46 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.