Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Kaapstraat 80
Apartment at Kaapstraat 80 in 's-Gravenhage (Transvaalkwartier-Zuid neighbourhood). The home was built in 1923 and has 80 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label E. The nearest railway station is Den Haag Moerwijk (1.5 km). The nearest primary school is Islamitische Basisschool Yunus Emre (90 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted22 Jul 2026€ 275,000−€ 10,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 285,000
Property details
- Living area
- 80 m²
- Construction year
- 1923
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- E
- WOZ value
- € 265,000
- Ownership
- Leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Transvaalkwartier-Zuid, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Share of persons in poverty
- High poverty11.2%
- Severe loneliness (neighbourhood)
- High21.8%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated305 persons
- Liveability class
- Poorgrossly inadequate
- Liveability score
- clearly below average-0.2867 score
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safety
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.27 score
- Livability Meter: housing stock
- Clearly below average-0.1509 score
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)
- high share29.3%
- Net labour participation
- Low60%
- Obesity (neighbourhood)
- High20.3%
- High stress (neighbourhood)
- Much stress29.7%
- Green share within 500 m
- Little greenery5%
- Catering within 300 m
- Very many catering businesses, nightlife area28
- Crimes per 1,000 residents
- High crime76.9 per 1,000 residents
- Score nearest primary school (percentile)
- Low (bottom quarter)11%
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)71%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)63.7%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure24
- Permits <500 m (3 months)
- Very high construction activity6
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance9%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby6
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island2.2 °C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside44.4%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors42.3%
- Number of hazardous installations (REV) within 1 km
- Cluster of risky facilities nearby5
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)
- Deep (0.5–2 m)1.35 m
- Flood risk class
- High flood risklarge
- Shared plot
- Shared plotYes
- Share of homes with solar power
- Few solar panels9%
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Elevated emissions60 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Inefficient (label E)322 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- UneconomicalE
- Distance to military terrain
- Near military site1.9 km
- Within Wbb soil location
- Within registered soil locationYes
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- PFOA in soil (nearest measurement point)
- Elevated2.1 µg/kg
- Proportion of flexible employment contracts
- Much flexible work52.5%· NL 27%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values6.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.872 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away41.1 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)46.1 km
- Distance to nearest emission source
- ample distance1.1 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)6.3 km
- Distance to railway line
- Far from rail1.1 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
22 permits within 500 m · 34 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
11th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 248 pupils
Disadvantage score 45 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
3rd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 13 pupils · total 126 pupils
Disadvantage score 43 — more disadvantage than 81% of schools
4th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 142 pupils
Disadvantage score 44 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
4th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 84 pupils · total 605 pupils
Disadvantage score 143 — more disadvantage than 100% of schools
74th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 319 pupils
Disadvantage score 40 — more disadvantage than 79% of schools
74th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 52 pupils · total 392 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
26th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 169 pupils
Disadvantage score 52 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
4th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 230 pupils
Disadvantage score 52 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
23rd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 129 pupils
Disadvantage score 36 — more disadvantage than 76% of schools
56th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 308 pupils
Disadvantage score 50 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
0th percentile — low · 57% passed · CE avg 5.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 221 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
2nd percentile — low · 79% passed · CE avg 5.9 · VBO · 76 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
49th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 100 exam candidates
75th percentile — average · 100% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/PRO · 12 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.