Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Kleiweg 197
Terraced house at Kleiweg 197 in Rotterdam (Hillegersberg Zuid neighbourhood). The home was built in 1928 and has 178 m² of living space, a 75 m² plot, 3 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Rotterdam Noord (664 m). The nearest primary school is De Bergse Zonnebloem (168 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted23 Jul 2026€ 799,000−€ 51,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 850,000
Property details
- Living area
- 178 m²
- Plot
- 75 m²
- Construction year
- 1928
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 753,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Hillegersberg Zuid, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated150 persons
- Children per primary school place (proxy)
- Many children per place1.68 ratio
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure22
- Distance to airport
- Directly next to airport2.8 km
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress47 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby9
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside44.3%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors41.6%
- Foundation risk
- High risklarge
- Building coverage percentage
- Almost completely built up100%
- Unbuilt plot area
- Almost completely built up0 m²
- Share of renewable energy
- moderate share sustainable29%
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Nearby (0.5-1 km)876 m
- Distance to airport (incl. small)
- Aerodrome nearby — slight aircraft noise possible2.6 km
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)
- Elevated1.4%
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Noticeably warmer1.6 °C
- Traffic on your own street
- Busy through traffic route7,500 per day
- Proportion of flexible employment contracts
- Much flexible work33.3%· NL 27%
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space151 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)140 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential10,505 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield997 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.963 µg/m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
22 permits within 500 m · 25 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
43rd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 385 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
94th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 317 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
93rd percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 6 pupils · total 223 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
12th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 34 pupils · total 204 pupils
Disadvantage score 95: more disadvantage than 97% of schools
69th percentile: average · DIA · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 125 pupils
Disadvantage score 22: more disadvantage than 61% of schools
6th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 217 pupils
Disadvantage score 62: more disadvantage than 90% of schools
43rd percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 261 pupils
Disadvantage score 71: more disadvantage than 93% of schools
20th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 173 pupils
Disadvantage score 57: more disadvantage than 88% of schools
6th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 280 pupils
Disadvantage score 61: more disadvantage than 90% of schools
94th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 51 pupils · total 415 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
33rd percentile: average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 182 exam candidates
75th percentile: average · 98% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 92 exam candidates
66th percentile: average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 67 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
5th percentile: low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO · 70 exam candidates
51st percentile: average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 41 exam candidates
4th percentile: low · 75% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 71 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
3rd percentile: low · 75% passed · CE avg 6.0 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 224 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.