Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Kortebrantstraat 29
Apartment at Kortebrantstraat 29 in Rotterdam (Rubroek neighbourhood). The home was built in 1955 and has 63 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Stadhuis (623 m). The nearest primary school is Waalse School (298 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted23 Jul 2026€ 345,000−€ 15,000
- Listed for sale3 Jul 2026€ 360,000
Property details
- Living area
- 63 m²
- Construction year
- 1955
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 324,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Rubroek, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated225 persons
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safety
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.1966 score
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)
- high share20.2%
- Catering within 300 m
- Very many catering businesses, nightlife area22
- Crimes per 1,000 residents
- High crime85.4 per 1,000 residents
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)75.8%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)71.6%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure13
- Distance to airport
- Directly next to airport4.7 km
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance9.1%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby14
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island2.4 °C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside29.9%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors32%
- Share of homes with solar power
- Few solar panels0%
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Nearby (0.5-1 km)550 m
- Distance to railway line
- Close to railway294 m
- Fine dust (PM2.5)
- Elevated10.8 µg/m³
- Road traffic noise
- Considerable noise16.5%
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)
- Elevated1.4%
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Multiple sources3
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Masts within 300 m
- Multiple transmission masts4
- Share of social assistance recipients
- Elevated6.7%
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot1,030 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical440 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low1.183 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away21.2 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)27.1 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)4.2 km
- Distance to overhead high-voltage line
- Well away6,747 m
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
13 permits · 3 construction plans within 500 m · 32 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
55th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 393 pupils
Disadvantage score 124: more disadvantage than 99% of schools
36th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 149 pupils
Disadvantage score 56: more disadvantage than 88% of schools
71st percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 109 pupils
Disadvantage score 38: more disadvantage than 77% of schools
59th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 128 pupils
Disadvantage score 40: more disadvantage than 80% of schools
53rd percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 186 pupils
Disadvantage score 57: more disadvantage than 88% of schools
23rd percentile: low · DIA · grade 8: 11 pupils · total 141 pupils
Disadvantage score 51: more disadvantage than 85% of schools
48th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 405 pupils
Disadvantage score 28: more disadvantage than 69% of schools
47th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 284 pupils
Disadvantage score 77: more disadvantage than 95% of schools
45th percentile: average · DIA · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 364 pupils
Disadvantage score 56: more disadvantage than 88% of schools
61st percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 368 pupils
Disadvantage score 65: more disadvantage than 91% of schools
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
5th percentile: low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO · 70 exam candidates
21st percentile: low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 55 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
59th percentile: average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 106 exam candidates
3rd percentile: low · 75% passed · CE avg 6.0 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 224 exam candidates
97th percentile: high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.8 · HAVO/VWO · 36 exam candidates
51st percentile: average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 41 exam candidates
5th percentile: low · 78% passed · CE avg 6.2 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 180 exam candidates
8th percentile: low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO · 55 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.