Price drops in and around Utrecht
More homes in and around Utrecht whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Laan van Soestbergen 25 BS
Terraced house at Laan van Soestbergen 25 in Utrecht (Watervogelbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1931 and has 55 m² of living space, a 92 m² plot, 3 bedrooms and energy label D. The nearest railway station is Station Vaartsche Rijn (310 m). The nearest primary school is Basisschool Agatha Snellen (527 m).
Price & status history
- Under offer13 Jul 2026
- Relisted30 Jun 2026€ 519,000−€ 26,000
- Listed for sale27 May 2026€ 545,000
Property details
- Living area
- 55 m²
- Plot
- 92 m²
- Construction year
- 1931
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- D
- WOZ value
- € 492,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Watervogelbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Distance to railway line
- Very close to railway86 m
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby10
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby6
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island1.9 °C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside33.2%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space76 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical700 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential5,276 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield999 kWh/kWp/yr
- Housing market throughput (sales per year)
- High throughput3.55%
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
1 permit within 500 m · 45 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
97th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 211 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
90th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 90 pupils · total 509 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
87th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 291 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
70th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 150 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
17th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 8 pupils · total 106 pupils
Disadvantage score 21 — more disadvantage than 60% of schools
68th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 219 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
13th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 74 pupils
Disadvantage score 13 — more disadvantage than 48% of schools
85th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 276 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
30th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 341 pupils
Disadvantage score 36 — more disadvantage than 76% of schools
100th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 183 pupils
Disadvantage score 34 — more disadvantage than 75% of schools
88th percentile — high · 95% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VWO · 172 exam candidates
8th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 274 exam candidates
14th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 270 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · VBO
92nd percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.6 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 46 exam candidates
2nd percentile — low · 79% passed · CE avg 5.8 · HAVO/VWO · 33 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
92nd percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 175 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.