Price drops in and around Tilburg
More homes in and around Tilburg whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Lennondreef 20
Semi-detached at Lennondreef 20 in Tilburg (Quirijnstok Zuid-Oost neighbourhood). The home was built in 1990 and has 223 m² of living space, a 370 m² plot, 5 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Tilburg (2.6 km). The nearest primary school is Basisschool Den Hazennest (379 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted23 Jul 2026€ 750,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 775,000
Property details
- Living area
- 223 m²
- Plot
- 370 m²
- Construction year
- 1990
- Property type
- Semi-detached
- Bedrooms
- 5
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 591,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Quirijnstok Zuid-Oost, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Obesity (neighbourhood)
- High16.2%
- General practitioners within 1 km
- No GP within 1 km0
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Very close (<500 m)499 m
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby21
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby9
- Number of risk sources within 1 km
- Many sources9
- Number of hazardous installations (REV) within 1 km
- Cluster of risky facilities nearby5
- Average lowest groundwater level (GLG)
- Deep, risk of pile rot254 m above sea level
- Distance to nearest emission source
- nearby322 m
- Distance to tram/metro line
- Far away8.5 km
- Fine dust (PM2.5)
- Elevated10.1 µg/m³
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)
- Elevated1.8%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- Elevated1.9%
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Noticeably warmer1.2 °C
- Masts within 300 m
- Multiple transmission masts3
- Distance to international school
- Far away23.7 km
- Distance to interchange station
- Quite far3.7 km
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Very spacious plot241 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar power
- Many solar panels58%
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space176 m²
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential12,272 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield996 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11.5%
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
50 zoning plan amendments within 5 km.
Schools
65th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 68 pupils · total 373 pupils
Disadvantage score 12 — more disadvantage than 46% of schools
46th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 416 pupils
Disadvantage score 47 — more disadvantage than 83% of schools
84th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 201 pupils
Disadvantage score 46 — more disadvantage than 83% of schools
36th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 226 pupils
Disadvantage score 27 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
6th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 209 pupils
Disadvantage score 81 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
36th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 94 pupils
Disadvantage score 10 — more disadvantage than 42% of schools
85th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 69 pupils · total 515 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
18th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 211 pupils
Disadvantage score 17 — more disadvantage than 55% of schools
16th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 215 pupils
Disadvantage score 88 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
90th percentile — high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 67 pupils · total 572 pupils
Disadvantage score 8 — more disadvantage than 36% of schools
no exam results · PRO
17th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 128 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
4th percentile — low · 78% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO · 73 exam candidates
46th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 202 exam candidates
13th percentile — low · 82% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 113 exam candidates
89th percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.7 · HAVO/VWO · 110 exam candidates
52nd percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 116 exam candidates
16th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 71 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.