Price drops in and around Amersfoort
More homes in and around Amersfoort whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
18/07/2026 | Zuiderzeeboulevard 61 Bunschoten-Spakenburg | € 1.175.000 € 1.148.000 | -2.3% | 140 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Rembrandt van Rijnstraat 7 Bunschoten-Spakenburg | € 597.000 € 579.000 | -3.0% | 132 m²195 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Saloméstraat 14 Amersfoort | € 595.000 € 565.000 | -5.0% | 103 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Straat van Corsica 145 Amersfoort | € 495.000 € 479.000 | -3.2% | 110 m²102 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Achter de Arnhemse Poortwal 9 Amersfoort | € 619.000 € 599.000 | -3.2% | 101 m²75 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | De Steenuil 23 Amersfoort | € 405.000 € 399.000 | -1.5% | 67 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Kritzingerlaan 61 Zeist | € 1.065.000 € 945.000 | -11.3% | 211 m²492 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Nieuwstraat 30 Baarn | € 300.000 € 285.000 | -5.0% | 47 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Marktstraat 16 b Scherpenzeel (GE) | € 500.000 € 475.000 | -5.0% | 118 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Emmalaan 6 B Baarn | € 2.300.000 € 2.095.000 | -8.9% | 512 m²1996 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | Baak van Scheveningen 49 Amersfoort | € 685.000 € 615.000 | -10.2% | 110 m²106 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | Balidwarsstraat 1 Baarn | € 345.000 € 330.000 | -4.3% | 69 m²76 m² | |||
14/07/2026 | Homeruslaan 4 Zeist | € 1.795.000 € 1.775.000 | -1.1% | 203 m²1000 m² | |||
14/07/2026 | den Blieklaan 7 Soest | € 1.425.000 € 1.325.000 | -7.0% | 169 m²670 m² | |||
14/07/2026 | Grote Haag 121 Amersfoort | € 695.000 € 649.000 | -6.6% | 98 m² | |||
14/07/2026 | Arnhemseweg 188 Amersfoort | € 650.000 € 639.500 | -1.6% | 111 m²195 m² | |||
14/07/2026 | Van Oldenbarneveltstraat 94 Achterveld (UT) | € 450.000 € 425.000 | -5.6% | 122 m²166 m² | |||
13/07/2026 | Theo Dobbehof 44 Soest | € 525.000 € 499.500 | -4.9% | 128 m²153 m² | |||
13/07/2026 | Meridiaan 52 Amersfoort | € 475.000 € 385.000 | -18.9% | 80 m² | |||
13/07/2026 | Soesterweg 221 Amersfoort | € 400.000 € 375.000 | -6.3% | 72 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Lichtpenweg 148
Apartment at Lichtpenweg 148 in Amersfoort (Hoefkwartier neighbourhood). The home was built in 2024 and has 64 m² of living space, 1 bedroom and energy label A++. The nearest railway station is Amersfoort Schothorst (297 m). The nearest primary school is obs De Wijde Wereld (633 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced17 Jun 2026€ 370,000−€ 15,000
- Listed for sale10 Jun 2026€ 385,000
Property details
- Living area
- 64 m²
- Construction year
- 2024
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 1
- Energy label
- A++
- WOZ value
- € 393,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Hoefkwartier, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Distance to railway lineⓘ
- Very close to railway68 m
- Serious noise nuisance from trains (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Strong rail nuisance5.2%
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)ⓘ
- High4.3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High3%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby15
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Can find cooling outside the homeⓘ
- Few people find cooling outside34.7%
- Able to find cooling in the propertyⓘ
- Few people can cool off indoors44.5%
- Share of social assistance recipientsⓘ
- High13.2%
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)ⓘ
- Very generous plot4,350 m²
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- High share of renewable energy88%
- Calculated CO₂ emissionsⓘ
- Low emissions2 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)ⓘ
- Efficient (label A/B)8 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy labelⓘ
- EconomicalA++
- Avg. natural gas consumptionⓘ
- Economical190 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values13%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂ⓘ
- Very low0.442 µg/m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
21 permits · 9 construction plans within 500 m · 50 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
15th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 257 pupils
Disadvantage score 92 — more disadvantage than 97% of schools
15th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 217 pupils
Disadvantage score 53 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
53rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 256 pupils
Disadvantage score 11 — more disadvantage than 44% of schools
24th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 200 pupils
Disadvantage score 7 — more disadvantage than 35% of schools
76th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 220 pupils
Disadvantage score 2 — more disadvantage than 16% of schools
68th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 34 pupils · total 289 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
53rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 281 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
35th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 13 pupils · total 117 pupils
Disadvantage score 7 — more disadvantage than 34% of schools
32nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 199 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 77% of schools
87th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 166 pupils
Disadvantage score 21 — more disadvantage than 61% of schools
no exam results · MAVO
32nd percentile — average · 86% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 103 exam candidates
32nd percentile — average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 112 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
41st percentile — average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 139 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
16th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 169 exam candidates
54th percentile — average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 157 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.