Price drops in and around Amersfoort
More homes in and around Amersfoort whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Achter de Arnhemse Poortwal 9
Terraced house at Achter de Arnhemse Poortwal 9 in Amersfoort (Grote Haag neighbourhood). The home was built in 1930 and has 109 m² of living space, a 75 m² plot, 2 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Amersfoort Centraal (851 m). The nearest primary school is P.C. basisschool Prins Willem Alexanderschool (325 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted17 Jul 2026€ 599,000−€ 20,000
- Price reduced18 Jun 2026€ 619,000−€ 31,000
- Listed for sale27 May 2026€ 650,000
Property details
- Living area
- 109 m²
- Plot
- 75 m²
- Construction year
- 1930
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 568,000
- Ownership
- —
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Grote Haag, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)
- Severely disruptive56 dB
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)
- High4.3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress43 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby10
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby9
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island1.9 °C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside33.9%
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions20 kg/m2/yr
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space110 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)112 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical620 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential7,477 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Good yield973 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values13%
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
113 permits · 2 construction plans within 500 m · 35 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
93rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 278 pupils
Disadvantage score 17 — more disadvantage than 55% of schools
94th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 206 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
100th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 335 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
83rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 403 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
76th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 61 pupils · total 403 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
45th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 217 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 77% of schools
3rd percentile — low · DIA · grade 8: 6 pupils · total 116 pupils
Disadvantage score 5 — more disadvantage than 29% of schools
52nd percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 400 pupils
Disadvantage score 33 — more disadvantage than 74% of schools
98th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 67 pupils · total 459 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
12th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 244 pupils
Disadvantage score 35 — more disadvantage than 76% of schools
89th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 137 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
67th percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 327 exam candidates
97th percentile — high · 94% passed · CE avg 7.0 · VWO · 87 exam candidates
41st percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 66 exam candidates
29th percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 58 exam candidates
37th percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 241 exam candidates
16th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 169 exam candidates
35th percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 186 exam candidates
32nd percentile — average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 112 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.