Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
23/07/2026 | Pisuissestraat 75 Den Haag | € 420.000 € 400.000 | -4.8% | 112 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Louis Couperusplein 52 Den Haag | € 840.000 € 829.500 | -1.3% | 153 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Volmerlaan 4 F035 Rijswijk (ZH) | € 309.500 € 300.000 | -3.1% | 53 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Kerkweg 14 Pijnacker | € 400.000 € 379.000 | -5.3% | 103 m²182 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Mient 138 Den Haag | € 325.000 € 300.000 | -7.7% | 70 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Erasmusweg 1903 Den Haag | € 550.000 € 500.000 | -9.1% | 156 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Kaapstraat 80 Den Haag | € 285.000 € 275.000 | -3.5% | 82 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Buizerdlaan 213 Leidschendam | € 525.000 € 499.000 | -5.0% | 83 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Segbroeklaan 10 Den Haag | € 425.000 € 400.000 | -5.9% | 109 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Tollenspark 15 's-Gravenzande | € 770.000 € 750.000 | -2.6% | 156 m²213 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Van Loostraat 116 Den Haag | € 775.000 € 725.000 | -6.5% | 138 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | San Franciscosingel 10 Den Haag | € 850.000 € 800.000 | -5.9% | 199 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Zeesluisweg 62 D Den Haag | € 560.000 € 524.500 | -6.3% | 75 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Aart van der Leeuwlaan 84 Delft | € 370.000 € 360.000 | -2.7% | 104 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Newtonplein 21 A Den Haag | € 239.500 € 219.500 | -8.3% | 29 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Kievitstraat 11 Honselersdijk | € 445.000 € 422.500 | -5.1% | 88 m²134 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Boddaertstraat 28 Den Haag | € 399.000 € 375.000 | -6.0% | 98 m²87 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Loosduinsekade 571 Den Haag | € 315.000 € 300.000 | -4.8% | 88 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Tulpstraat 7 f Rijswijk (ZH) | € 275.000 € 265.000 | -3.6% | 52 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | De Genestetlaan 256 Den Haag | € 387.500 € 375.000 | -3.2% | 135 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Louis Couperusplein 52
Apartment at Louis Couperusplein 52 in 's-Gravenhage (Voorhout neighbourhood). The home was built in 1935 and has 152 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Spui (913 m). The nearest primary school is Basisschool van de Stichting Haagsche School Vereniging (153 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted23 Jul 2026€ 829,500−€ 10,500
- Listed for sale29 Jun 2026€ 840,000
Property details
- Living area
- 152 m²
- Construction year
- 1935
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 775,000
- Ownership
- Municipal property encumbered with leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Voorhout, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- Low share renewable0%
- Residents in 100m grid cellⓘ
- Very densely populated85 persons
- Catering within 300 mⓘ
- Very many catering businesses, nightlife area50
- Crimes per 1,000 residentsⓘ
- High crime358.8 per 1,000 residents
- Parking tariffⓘ
- Very high rate€ 7.15
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)86%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)87.1%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)ⓘ
- Much building pressure35
- Permits <500 m (3 months)ⓘ
- Very high construction activity8
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)ⓘ
- Above the standardYes
- Urban heat island effectⓘ
- Strong heat island1.9 °C
- Able to find cooling in the propertyⓘ
- Few people can cool off indoors41%
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)ⓘ
- Deep (0.5–2 m)1.1 m
- Flood risk classⓘ
- High flood risklarge
- Dual designationⓘ
- Cultural-historical valueValue - Cultural heritage
- Shared plotⓘ
- Shared plotYes
- Share of homes with solar powerⓘ
- Few solar panels2%
- Distance to nearest transmission mastⓘ
- Transmission mast nearby (<100 m)64 m
- Distance to military terrainⓘ
- Near military site0.6 km
- Within Wbb soil locationⓘ
- Within registered soil locationYes
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Above-average nuisance6.8%
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Multiple industrial businesses5
- Industrial emitters within 2 kmⓘ
- Multiple sources4
- PFAS standard breach within 10 kmⓘ
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)ⓘ
- Very generous plot711 m²
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values6.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂ⓘ
- Very low0.839 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facilityⓘ
- Far away42 km
- Distance to biomass plantⓘ
- At distance (>3 km)47.7 km
- Distance to nearest emission sourceⓘ
- ample distance1.4 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbineⓘ
- Far away (>2 km)5.5 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
32 permits within 500 m · 21 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
92nd percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 705 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
84th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 232 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
98th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 213 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
38th percentile: average · DIA · grade 8: 49 pupils · total 378 pupils
Disadvantage score 72: more disadvantage than 93% of schools
93rd percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 285 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
94th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 58 pupils · total 429 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
96th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 220 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
4th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 137 pupils
Disadvantage score 57: more disadvantage than 88% of schools
no recent test score · total 36 pupils
Disadvantage score 7: more disadvantage than 35% of schools
4th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 272 pupils
Disadvantage score 108: more disadvantage than 98% of schools
5th percentile: low · 79% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 130 exam candidates
22nd percentile: low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 225 exam candidates
61st percentile: average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 69 exam candidates
90th percentile: high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.6 · HAVO/VWO · 6 exam candidates
61st percentile: average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.6 · HAVO/VWO · 175 exam candidates
93rd percentile: high · 91% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VWO · 115 exam candidates
52nd percentile: average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.5 · HAVO/VWO · 136 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
5th percentile: low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.1 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 116 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.