Price drops in and around Spijkenisse
More homes in and around Spijkenisse whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
23/07/2026 | Maasboulevard 44 B Spijkenisse | € 425.000 € 399.900 | -5.9% | 118 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Weizichtstraat 21 Rotterdam | € 340.000 € 320.000 | -5.9% | 85 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Grote Visserijstraat 79 B Rotterdam | € 245.000 € 238.000 | -2.9% | 55 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Texasweg 8 Hoogvliet Rotterdam | € 350.000 € 335.000 | -4.3% | 106 m²125 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Hongerlandsedijk 698 Spijkenisse | € 499.900 € 475.000 | -5.0% | 118 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Willem Buytewechstraat 115 C Rotterdam | € 350.000 € 335.500 | -4.1% | 66 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Ruisvoornpad 51 Hoogvliet Rotterdam | € 574.500 € 549.500 | -4.3% | 158 m²154 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Laningpad 2 Spijkenisse | € 620.000 € 585.000 | -5.7% | 139 m²442 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Nieuwstraat 23 A Schiedam | € 395.000 € 374.000 | -5.3% | 97 m²40 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Rietdekker 25 Poortugaal | € 819.000 € 799.000 | -2.4% | 163 m²308 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Alphons Ariënsstraat 186 Schiedam | € 349.500 € 325.000 | -7.0% | 75 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Hollandiahof 32 Schiedam | € 575.000 € 539.000 | -6.3% | 128 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Houtlaan 93 Rotterdam | € 1.250.000 € 1.200.000 | -4.0% | 132 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Ranonkelstraat 153 Spijkenisse | € 475.000 € 425.000 | -10.5% | 118 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Henegouwerlaan 25 A Rotterdam | € 395.000 € 375.000 | -5.1% | 115 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Kemperhof 59 Vlaardingen | € 619.000 € 599.000 | -3.2% | 142 m²126 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Stationstraat 76 Schiedam | € 350.000 € 345.000 | -1.4% | 86 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Toermalijn 37 Rhoon | € 1.150.000 € 1.135.000 | -1.3% | 163 m²440 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Plein Eendragt 19 A Schiedam | € 1.175.000 € 1.148.000 | -2.3% | 320 m²247 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Hudsonstraat 189 Rotterdam | € 560.000 € 550.000 | -1.8% | 110 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Maasboulevard 44 B
Home at Maasboulevard 44 in Spijkenisse (Schenkel-Noordoost neighbourhood). The home was built in 1996 and has 118 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Spijkenisse Centrum (1.2 km). The nearest primary school is PC Basissch de Hoeksteen (225 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted23 Jul 2026€ 399,900−€ 25,100
- Price reduced16 Jun 2026€ 425,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale10 Jun 2026€ 450,000
Property details
- Living area
- 118 m²
- Plot
- —
- Construction year
- 1996
- Property type
- Home
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 416,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Schenkel-Noordoost, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- Low share renewable0%
- Residents in 100m grid cellⓘ
- Very densely populated130 persons
- Obesity (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- High17%
- Distance to interchange stationⓘ
- Far away19.1 km
- Distance to train stationⓘ
- Station very far away16.6 km
- Permits <500 m (12 months)ⓘ
- Much building pressure8
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby19
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)ⓘ
- Above the standardYes
- Dual designationⓘ
- Archaeological protectionValue - Archaeology - 1
- Shared plotⓘ
- Shared plotYes
- Distance to nearest transmission mastⓘ
- Transmission mast nearby (<100 m)9 m
- Distance to airportⓘ
- Nearby13.6 km
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)ⓘ
- Elevated1.1%
- Odour nuisance from wood burning (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- Elevated4.1%
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)ⓘ
- Elevated3.1%
- PFAS standard breach within 10 kmⓘ
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- PFOA in soil (nearest measurement point)ⓘ
- Elevated2.8 µg/kg
- Radio mast on own propertyⓘ
- Mast on or against own propertyYes
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- Plot area (cadastral plot)ⓘ
- Generous plot468 m²
- Plan statusⓘ
- Finalfinal
- Usable roof area for solar panelsⓘ
- Ample roof space463 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)ⓘ
- Efficient (label A/B)175 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy labelⓘ
- EconomicalB
- Avg. natural gas consumptionⓘ
- Economical680 m³
- Solar potential roofⓘ
- Very high potential14,604 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWpⓘ
- Excellent yield1,043 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values10.1%
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
8 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 24 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
70th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 393 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
10th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 196 pupils
Disadvantage score 18: more disadvantage than 57% of schools
37th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 269 pupils
Disadvantage score 90: more disadvantage than 96% of schools
36th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 373 pupils
Disadvantage score 62: more disadvantage than 90% of schools
2nd percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 12 pupils · total 182 pupils
Disadvantage score 59: more disadvantage than 89% of schools
35th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 241 pupils
Disadvantage score 33: more disadvantage than 74% of schools
41st percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 234 pupils
Disadvantage score 0: more disadvantage than 2% of schools
43rd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 57 pupils · total 411 pupils
Disadvantage score 27: more disadvantage than 68% of schools
27th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 457 pupils
Disadvantage score 29: more disadvantage than 71% of schools
8th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 219 pupils
Disadvantage score 8: more disadvantage than 38% of schools
34th percentile: average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 201 exam candidates
6th percentile: low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.2 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 162 exam candidates
56th percentile: average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 107 exam candidates
85th percentile: high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 179 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
36th percentile: average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 56 exam candidates
37th percentile: average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 199 exam candidates
96th percentile: high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 69 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · VBO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.