Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Maassluisstraat 202
Apartment at Maassluisstraat 202 in Amsterdam (Delflandpleinbuurt-West neighbourhood). The home was built in 1965 and has 76 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Heemstedestraat (319 m). The nearest primary school is Brede school Fiep Westendorp (266 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced22 Jun 2026€ 499,000−€ 50,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 549,000
Property details
- Living area
- 76 m²
- Construction year
- 1965
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 516,000
- Ownership
- Municipal leasehold (leasehold expiry date: 30-09-2037)
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Delflandpleinbuurt-West, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Distance to railway line
- Very close to railway72 m
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress43 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby8
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside32.6%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors34.1%
- Aircraft movements per hour (nearest airport)
- Very busy54.1 per hour
- Share of households lowest 40% income
- strong concentration of low incomes65.2%
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot689 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)85 kWh/m²/yr
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical160 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.694 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away6.4 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)6.4 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)5 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
5 permits within 500 m · 39 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
47th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 332 pupils
Disadvantage score 52 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
12th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 73 pupils
Disadvantage score 23 — more disadvantage than 63% of schools
71st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 250 pupils
Disadvantage score 6 — more disadvantage than 31% of schools
87th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 71 pupils · total 533 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
74th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 90 pupils
Disadvantage score 12 — more disadvantage than 48% of schools
3rd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 203 pupils
Disadvantage score 46 — more disadvantage than 83% of schools
8th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 299 pupils
Disadvantage score 2 — more disadvantage than 16% of schools
6th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 292 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
51st percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 46 pupils · total 403 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
34th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 489 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
1st percentile — low · 69% passed · CE avg 5.8 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 231 exam candidates
66th percentile — average · 97% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 68 exam candidates
72nd percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO · 38 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO
5th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 138 exam candidates
56th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 97 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
0th percentile — low · 59% passed · CE avg 5.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 29 exam candidates
no exam results · VWO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.