Price drops in and around Nijmegen
More homes in and around Nijmegen whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Gerard Noodtstraat 71
Apartment at Gerard Noodtstraat 71 in Nijmegen (Stadscentrum neighbourhood). The home was built in 1996 and has 101 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Nijmegen (1.2 km). The nearest primary school is Basisschool de Buut (477 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted8 Jul 2026€ 450,000−€ 35,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 485,000
Property details
- Living area
- 101 m²
- Construction year
- 1996
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 478,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Stadscentrum, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby17
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside27.3%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors27.1%
- Share of households lowest 40% income
- strong concentration of low incomes72.3%
- Distance to business district
- Adjacent to business park0 m
- Catering within 300 m
- Very many catering businesses, nightlife area41
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safety
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.2117 score
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot3,530 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)146 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values10.1%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.612 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away16.6 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)10.2 km
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Well away (>2 km)2.4 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
7 permits · 4 construction plans within 500 m · 19 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
100th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 212 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
87th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 224 pupils
Disadvantage score 0 — more disadvantage than 8% of schools
74th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 449 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
75th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 231 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
76th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 46 pupils · total 335 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
89th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 224 pupils
Disadvantage score 14 — more disadvantage than 50% of schools
91st percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 211 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
88th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 61 pupils · total 395 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
61st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 211 pupils
Disadvantage score 6 — more disadvantage than 32% of schools
60th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 315 pupils
Disadvantage score 53 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
62nd percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.6 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 135 exam candidates
81st percentile — high · 92% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VWO · 154 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO
53rd percentile — average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 167 exam candidates
51st percentile — average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 262 exam candidates
77th percentile — high · 96% passed · CE avg 6.6 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 352 exam candidates
85th percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 117 exam candidates
48th percentile — average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 190 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
8th percentile — low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.2 · HAVO · 101 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.