Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Mijehof 290
Terraced house at Mijehof 290 in Amsterdam (Holendrecht-Oost neighbourhood). The home was built in 1981 and has 82 m² of living space, a 143 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Amsterdam Holendrecht (574 m). The nearest primary school is IKC De Brink (114 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted16 Jun 2026€ 489,000−€ 11,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 500,000
Property details
- Living area
- 82 m²
- Plot
- 143 m²
- Construction year
- 1981
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 547,000
- Ownership
- Property encumbered with leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Holendrecht-Oost, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- High emissions4,193 kg/m2/yr
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)86.5%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure8
- Ground subsidence (estimated, mm/year)
- Significant ground subsidence-17.8 mm/yr
- Average highest groundwater level (GHG)
- Very high groundwater19 m above sea level
- Groundwater table (Gt)
- Very wet (high groundwater level)IIa
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Spacious plot83 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar power
- Above average39%
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space96 m²
- Energy label
- EconomicalB
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential6,724 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,005 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
8 permits · 2 construction plans within 500 m · 16 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
42nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 235 pupils
Disadvantage score 93 — more disadvantage than 97% of schools
8th percentile — low · DIA · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 135 pupils
Disadvantage score 29 — more disadvantage than 71% of schools
11th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 186 pupils
Disadvantage score 79 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
19th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 152 pupils
Disadvantage score 59 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
40th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 378 pupils
Disadvantage score 120 — more disadvantage than 99% of schools
8th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 250 pupils
Disadvantage score 119 — more disadvantage than 99% of schools
11th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 304 pupils
Disadvantage score 111 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
3rd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 238 pupils
Disadvantage score 93 — more disadvantage than 97% of schools
10th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 269 pupils
Disadvantage score 40 — more disadvantage than 79% of schools
19th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 224 pupils
Disadvantage score 9 — more disadvantage than 40% of schools
1st percentile — low · 69% passed · CE avg 5.9 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 118 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
4th percentile — low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 282 exam candidates
2nd percentile — low · 79% passed · CE avg 5.8 · VBO/MAVO · 33 exam candidates
25th percentile — low · 95% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 38 exam candidates
6th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 7 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
39th percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 271 exam candidates
35th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 61 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.