Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Millingenhof 344
Apartment at Millingenhof 344 in Amsterdam (Holendrecht-Zuid neighbourhood). The home was built in 1977 and has 85 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label A+. The nearest railway station is Reigersbos (402 m). The nearest primary school is Holendrecht (329 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted25 Jul 2026€ 369,000−€ 6,000
- For sale24 Jul 2026
- Under offer11 Jul 2026
- Listed for sale6 Jun 2026€ 375,000
Property details
- Living area
- 85 m²
- Construction year
- 1977
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- A+
- WOZ value
- € 347,000
- Ownership
- —
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Holendrecht-Zuid, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated205 persons
- Liveability class
- Weakweak
- Liveability score
- clearly below average-0.2703 score
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safety
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.143 score
- Share of social rental housing in the neighbourhood
- Predominantly social rental83%
- Score nearest primary school (percentile)
- Low (bottom quarter)11%
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)72.6%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)64.4%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure11
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance11.5%
- Serious noise nuisance from trains (neighbourhood)
- Strong rail nuisance4.5%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside41.8%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors42%
- Ground subsidence (estimated, mm/year)
- Significant ground subsidence-25.1 mm/yr
- Average highest groundwater level (GHG)
- Very high groundwater19 m above sea level
- Groundwater table (Gt)
- Very wet (high groundwater level)IIa
- Leasehold or freehold
- LeaseholdYes
- Shared plot
- Shared plotYes
- Share of homes with solar power
- Few solar panels1%
- Average WOZ value (municipality)
- Above national average€ 575,000
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Nearby (0.5-1 km)766 m
- Distance to airport
- Nearby14 km
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)
- Elevated1.5%
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Multiple industrial businesses4
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Noticeably warmer1.3 °C
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot3,090 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions19 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)104 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA+
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.542 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away16.6 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
11 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 17 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
11th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 186 pupils
Disadvantage score 79: more disadvantage than 95% of schools
8th percentile: low · DIA · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 135 pupils
Disadvantage score 29: more disadvantage than 71% of schools
42nd percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 235 pupils
Disadvantage score 93: more disadvantage than 97% of schools
19th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 152 pupils
Disadvantage score 59: more disadvantage than 89% of schools
40th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 378 pupils
Disadvantage score 120: more disadvantage than 99% of schools
3rd percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 238 pupils
Disadvantage score 93: more disadvantage than 97% of schools
19th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 224 pupils
Disadvantage score 9: more disadvantage than 40% of schools
8th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 250 pupils
Disadvantage score 119: more disadvantage than 99% of schools
11th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 304 pupils
Disadvantage score 111: more disadvantage than 98% of schools
10th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 269 pupils
Disadvantage score 40: more disadvantage than 79% of schools
1st percentile: low · 69% passed · CE avg 5.9 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 118 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
4th percentile: low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 282 exam candidates
2nd percentile: low · 79% passed · CE avg 5.8 · VBO/MAVO · 33 exam candidates
25th percentile: low · 95% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 38 exam candidates
6th percentile: low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 7 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
39th percentile: average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 271 exam candidates
35th percentile: average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 61 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.