Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
22/07/2026 | Noorderhavenkade 140 A03 Rotterdam | € 375.000 € 350.000 | -6.7% | 77 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Weizichtstraat 21 Rotterdam | € 340.000 € 320.000 | -5.9% | 85 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Grote Visserijstraat 79 B Rotterdam | € 245.000 € 238.000 | -2.9% | 55 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Cannemanstraat 25 Rotterdam | € 399.000 € 385.000 | -3.5% | 106 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Elektroweg 6 B Rotterdam | € 525.000 € 495.000 | -5.7% | 92 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Elektroweg 4 B Rotterdam | € 525.000 € 495.000 | -5.7% | 92 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Elektroweg 2 A Rotterdam | € 555.000 € 535.000 | -3.6% | 87 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Elektroweg 2 B Rotterdam | € 525.000 € 495.000 | -5.7% | 92 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Elektroweg 6 A Rotterdam | € 565.000 € 540.000 | -4.4% | 87 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Texasweg 8 Hoogvliet Rotterdam | € 350.000 € 335.000 | -4.3% | 106 m²125 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Aart van der Leeuwlaan 84 Delft | € 370.000 € 360.000 | -2.7% | 104 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Lisstraat 14 A01 Rotterdam | € 294.500 € 275.000 | -6.6% | 51 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Willem Buytewechstraat 115 C Rotterdam | € 350.000 € 335.500 | -4.1% | 66 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Goudsesingel 270 C Rotterdam | € 275.000 € 260.000 | -5.5% | 45 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Ruisvoornpad 51 Hoogvliet Rotterdam | € 574.500 € 549.500 | -4.3% | 158 m²154 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Nieuwstraat 23 A Schiedam | € 395.000 € 374.000 | -5.3% | 97 m²40 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Rietdekker 25 Poortugaal | € 819.000 € 799.000 | -2.4% | 163 m²308 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Jan Wilspad 28 Rotterdam | € 565.000 € 550.000 | -2.6% | 124 m²151 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Alphons Ariënsstraat 186 Schiedam | € 349.500 € 325.000 | -7.0% | 75 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Hollandiahof 32 Schiedam | € 575.000 € 539.000 | -6.3% | 128 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Noorderhavenkade 140 A03
Apartment at Noorderhavenkade 140 in Rotterdam (Bergpolder neighbourhood). The home was built in 1935 and has 84 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Blijdorp (383 m). The nearest primary school is Dominicus (274 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced22 Jul 2026€ 350,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 375,000
Property details
- Living area
- 84 m²
- Construction year
- 1935
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 360,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Bergpolder, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- Low share renewable0%
- Livability Meter: physical environmentⓘ
- Unfavourable physical environment-0.0519 score
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)80.1%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)82.3%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)ⓘ
- Much building pressure52
- Permits <500 m (3 months)ⓘ
- Very high construction activity17
- Distance to airportⓘ
- Directly next to airport3.2 km
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Much neighbour nuisance8.8%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress42 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby14
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)ⓘ
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the homeⓘ
- Few people find cooling outside30.8%
- Able to find cooling in the propertyⓘ
- Few people can cool off indoors28%
- Flood risk classⓘ
- High flood risklarge
- Dual designationⓘ
- Cultural-historical valueValue - Cultural heritage
- Shared plotⓘ
- Shared plotYes
- Share of homes with solar powerⓘ
- Few solar panels1%
- Calculated CO₂ emissionsⓘ
- Elevated emissions51 kg/m2/yr
- Distance to airport (incl. small)ⓘ
- Aerodrome nearby — slight aircraft noise possible3 km
- Fine dust (PM2.5)ⓘ
- Elevated10.5 µg/m³
- Road traffic noiseⓘ
- Considerable noise14.6%
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)ⓘ
- Elevated1.4%
- PFAS standard breach within 10 kmⓘ
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Urban heat island effectⓘ
- Noticeably warmer1.6 °C
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- Avg. natural gas consumptionⓘ
- Economical680 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂ⓘ
- Very low1.188 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facilityⓘ
- Far away23 km
- Distance to biomass plantⓘ
- At distance (>3 km)28.3 km
- Distance to nearest emission sourceⓘ
- ample distance1.9 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbineⓘ
- Far away (>2 km)6 km
- Distance to sprayed cropⓘ
- Far away (>250 m)1.3 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
49 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 34 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
80th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 186 pupils
Disadvantage score 10 — more disadvantage than 41% of schools
69th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 73 pupils · total 528 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
81st percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 400 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
20th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 173 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
53rd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 201 pupils
Disadvantage score 23 — more disadvantage than 63% of schools
43rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 261 pupils
Disadvantage score 71 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
93rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 6 pupils · total 223 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
54th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 332 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
74th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 339 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
71st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 109 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 77% of schools
51st percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 41 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
47th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 69 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
8th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO · 55 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
9th percentile — low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.2 · HAVO/VWO · 178 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
1st percentile — low · 65% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 293 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.