Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Oeverpad 498
Apartment at Oeverpad 498 in Amsterdam (Meer en Oever neighbourhood). The home was built in 2004 and has 80 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A+. The nearest railway station is Postjesweg (1.8 km). The nearest primary school is IKC Het Talent (460 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced25 Jun 2026€ 485,000−€ 10,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 495,000
Property details
- Living area
- 80 m²
- Construction year
- 2004
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A+
- WOZ value
- € 550,000
- Ownership
- Municipal property encumbered with leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Meer en Oever, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress43 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby17
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Aircraft movements per hour (nearest airport)
- Very busy54.1 per hour
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated120 persons
- Liveability class
- Weakweak
- Liveability score
- clearly below average-0.1547 score
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot6,431 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions17 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)91 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA+
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical490 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.647 µg/m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
6 permits within 500 m · 35 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
2nd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 216 pupils
Disadvantage score 71 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
41st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 314 pupils
Disadvantage score 50 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
22nd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 65 pupils · total 471 pupils
Disadvantage score 16 — more disadvantage than 53% of schools
17th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 244 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 78% of schools
50th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 67 pupils · total 418 pupils
Disadvantage score 27 — more disadvantage than 68% of schools
43rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 513 pupils
Disadvantage score 71 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
23rd percentile — low · DIA · grade 8: 46 pupils · total 341 pupils
Disadvantage score 1 — more disadvantage than 8% of schools
3rd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 203 pupils
Disadvantage score 46 — more disadvantage than 83% of schools
11th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 232 pupils
Disadvantage score 54 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
10th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 226 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
3rd percentile — low · 75% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 299 exam candidates
56th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 97 exam candidates
5th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 138 exam candidates
78th percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO · 58 exam candidates
66th percentile — average · 97% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 68 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
35th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO/PRO · 93 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
0th percentile — low · 59% passed · CE avg 5.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 29 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.