Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Osdorper Ban 583
Apartment at Osdorper Ban 583 in Amsterdam (Botteskerkbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 2006 and has 92 m² of living space and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Amsterdam Lelylaan (2.7 km). The nearest primary school is Lukasschool (76 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted26 Jun 2026€ 25,000−€ 5,000
- Listed for sale25 Jun 2026€ 30,000
Property details
- Living area
- 92 m²
- Construction year
- 2006
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- —
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 463,000
- Ownership
- Municipal property encumbered with leasehold (leasehold expiry date: 30-04-2055)
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Botteskerkbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance9.8%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Glass horticulture area within 1 km
- Very many glasshouses (strong light nuisance)79,640 m²
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby15
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside37.5%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors37%
- Aircraft movements per hour (nearest airport)
- Very busy54.1 per hour
- Share of persons in poverty
- High poverty10.8%
- Share of social rental housing in the neighbourhood
- Predominantly social rental66%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical620 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.746 µg/m³
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)4.6 km
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Well away (>2 km)3.3 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
10 permits · 5 construction plans within 500 m · 23 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
41st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 314 pupils
Disadvantage score 50 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
50th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 67 pupils · total 418 pupils
Disadvantage score 27 — more disadvantage than 68% of schools
11th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 232 pupils
Disadvantage score 54 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
10th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 226 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
2nd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 216 pupils
Disadvantage score 71 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
34th percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 114 pupils
Disadvantage score 11 — more disadvantage than 44% of schools
43rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 513 pupils
Disadvantage score 71 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
13th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 333 pupils
Disadvantage score 60 — more disadvantage than 90% of schools
17th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 244 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 78% of schools
18th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 64 pupils · total 422 pupils
Disadvantage score 33 — more disadvantage than 74% of schools
3rd percentile — low · 75% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 299 exam candidates
78th percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO · 58 exam candidates
56th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 97 exam candidates
5th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 138 exam candidates
66th percentile — average · 97% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 68 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
35th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO/PRO · 93 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
0th percentile — low · 59% passed · CE avg 5.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 29 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.