Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Pisuissestraat 75
Apartment at Pisuissestraat 75 in 's-Gravenhage (Kom Loosduinen neighbourhood). The home was built in 1925 and has 110 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Den Haag Moerwijk (5.3 km). The nearest primary school is De Kleine Keizer (334 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted23 Jul 2026€ 400,000−€ 20,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 420,000
Property details
- Living area
- 110 m²
- Construction year
- 1925
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 370,000
- Ownership
- Municipal leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Kom Loosduinen, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable7%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated140 persons
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)
- high share23.3%
- Net labour participation
- Low60%
- Obesity (neighbourhood)
- High16.9%
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away7.2 km
- Children per primary school place (proxy)
- Many children per place1.99 ratio
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)80.1%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)80.8%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure9
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors43.6%
- Average lowest groundwater level (GLG)
- Deep, risk of pile rot172 m above sea level
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)
- Deep (0.5–2 m)1.91 m
- Flood risk class
- High flood risklarge
- Shared plot
- Shared plotYes
- Distance to nearest glasshouse horticulture
- Nearby466 m
- Distance to nearest greenhouse
- Greenhouse nearby (<500 m), possible light or noise nuisance466 m
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Above-average nuisance7.4%
- Glass horticulture area within 1 km
- Many greenhouses (possible light nuisance)11,513 m²
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Risk of light nuisance from glasshouses
- Greenhouse within 500 mYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Noticeably warmer1.1 °C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Below the national average49.9%
- Share of social assistance recipients
- Elevated5.1%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical680 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values6.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.804 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away43.8 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)47.2 km
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Well away (>2 km)4.4 km
- Distance to nearest emission source
- ample distance1.4 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
9 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 15 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
85th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 164 pupils
Disadvantage score 28: more disadvantage than 70% of schools
30th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 130 pupils
Disadvantage score 48: more disadvantage than 84% of schools
64th percentile: average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 224 pupils
Disadvantage score 28: more disadvantage than 69% of schools
45th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 179 pupils
Disadvantage score 34: more disadvantage than 75% of schools
98th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 223 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
49th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 303 pupils
Disadvantage score 26: more disadvantage than 67% of schools
12th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 249 pupils
Disadvantage score 84: more disadvantage than 96% of schools
65th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 59 pupils · total 509 pupils
Disadvantage score 10: more disadvantage than 44% of schools
9th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 159 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
74th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 438 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
73rd percentile: average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO · 54 exam candidates
74th percentile: average · 100% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 66 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
74th percentile: average · 97% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 99 exam candidates
52nd percentile: average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 123 exam candidates
31st percentile: average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 165 exam candidates
3rd percentile: low · 78% passed · CE avg 6.1 · HAVO/VWO · 157 exam candidates
13th percentile: low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 102 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.