Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Rijswijkseweg 71 C
Apartment at Rijswijkseweg 71 in 's-Gravenhage (Laakhaven-Oost neighbourhood). The home was built in 1995 and has 92 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Den Haag HS (441 m). The nearest primary school is De Baanbreker (340 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted24 Jul 2026€ 349,000−€ 20,000
- Listed for sale27 May 2026€ 369,000
Property details
- Living area
- 92 m²
- Construction year
- 1995
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 340,000
- Ownership
- Municipal property encumbered with leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Laakhaven-Oost, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of households lowest 40% income
- strong concentration of low incomes68.4%
- Severe loneliness (neighbourhood)
- High20.8%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated250 persons
- Liveability class
- Weakweak
- Liveability score
- clearly below average-0.1796 score
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safety
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.2435 score
- Livability Meter: housing stock
- Clearly below average-0.1149 score
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)
- high share24.3%
- Net labour participation
- Low60%
- Obesity (neighbourhood)
- High16.7%
- High stress (neighbourhood)
- Much stress31.1%
- Share of social rental housing in the neighbourhood
- Predominantly social rental67%
- Distance to business district
- Adjacent to business park10 m
- Crimes per 1,000 residents
- High crime116.2 per 1,000 residents
- Score nearest primary school (percentile)
- Low (bottom quarter)2%
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)77.6%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)64.9%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure15
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance8.2%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress43 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby7
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby6
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island2.3 °C
- Traffic on your own street
- Very busy (main/motorway)11,250 per day
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside32.9%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors38.2%
- Masts within 300 m
- Many transmission masts nearby9
- Number of risk sources within 1 km
- Many sources6
- Number of hazardous installations (REV) within 1 km
- Cluster of risky facilities nearby5
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)
- Deep (0.5–2 m)0.92 m
- Flood risk class
- High flood risklarge
- Shared plot
- Shared plotYes
- Share of renewable energy
- moderate share sustainable29%
- Share of homes with solar power
- Few solar panels0%
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Nearby (0.5-1 km)908 m
- Distance to nearest transmission mast
- Transmission mast nearby (<100 m)22 m
- Distance to military terrain
- Near military site1.4 km
- Distance to airport
- Nearby14.4 km
- Within Wbb soil location
- Within registered soil locationYes
- Noise load
- Heavy63 dB
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)
- Disturbing54 dB
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot3,107 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions17 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)86 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical270 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values6.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.879 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away39.7 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
15 permits within 500 m · 34 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
2nd percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 10 pupils · total 72 pupils
Disadvantage score 38: more disadvantage than 77% of schools
no recent test score · total 119 pupils
Disadvantage score 23: more disadvantage than 63% of schools
24th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 190 pupils
Disadvantage score 72: more disadvantage than 93% of schools
20th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 40 pupils · total 297 pupils
Disadvantage score 74: more disadvantage than 94% of schools
32nd percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 318 pupils
Disadvantage score 54: more disadvantage than 87% of schools
20th percentile: low · DIA · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 265 pupils
Disadvantage score 98: more disadvantage than 98% of schools
no recent test score · total 62 pupils
Disadvantage score 0: more disadvantage than 7% of schools
42nd percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 11 pupils · total 155 pupils
Disadvantage score 55: more disadvantage than 87% of schools
31st percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 175 pupils
Disadvantage score 51: more disadvantage than 85% of schools
53rd percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 85 pupils · total 260 pupils
Disadvantage score 55: more disadvantage than 87% of schools
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · PRO
90th percentile: high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.6 · HAVO/VWO · 6 exam candidates
75th percentile: average · 100% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/PRO · 12 exam candidates
2nd percentile: low · 79% passed · CE avg 5.9 · VBO · 76 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
52nd percentile: average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.5 · HAVO/VWO · 136 exam candidates
68th percentile: average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.6 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 233 exam candidates
72nd percentile: average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VWO · 109 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.