Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Robert Fruinlaan 17 2
Apartment at Robert Fruinlaan 17 in Amsterdam (Jacob Geelbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1956 and has 56 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Postjesweg (270 m). The nearest primary school is Brede School Huizinga (334 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted13 Jul 2026€ 375,000−€ 55,000
- Listed for sale4 Jun 2026€ 430,000
Property details
- Living area
- 56 m²
- Construction year
- 1956
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 387,000
- Ownership
- Municipal property encumbered with leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Jacob Geelbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance11.5%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress43 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby17
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside34.4%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors32.3%
- Aircraft movements per hour (nearest airport)
- Very busy54.1 per hour
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot4,268 m²
- Share of homes with solar power
- Above average26%
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical430 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.542 µg/m³
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)4.9 km
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Well away (>2 km)2.3 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)3.4 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
5 permits · 2 construction plans within 500 m · 40 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
6th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 292 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
15th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 338 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
22nd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 65 pupils · total 471 pupils
Disadvantage score 16 — more disadvantage than 53% of schools
3rd percentile — low · DIA · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 161 pupils
Disadvantage score 58 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
59th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 64 pupils · total 667 pupils
Disadvantage score 52 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
34th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 489 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
3rd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 203 pupils
Disadvantage score 46 — more disadvantage than 83% of schools
2nd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 199 pupils
Disadvantage score 46 — more disadvantage than 83% of schools
70th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 52 pupils · total 464 pupils
Disadvantage score 54 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
34th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 208 pupils
Disadvantage score 22 — more disadvantage than 62% of schools
5th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 138 exam candidates
56th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 97 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 59% passed · CE avg 5.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 29 exam candidates
66th percentile — average · 97% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 68 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
35th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO/PRO · 93 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 52% passed · CE avg 5.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 33 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.