Price drops in and around Hoogvliet Rotterdam
More homes in and around Hoogvliet Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Ruisvoornpad 51
Terraced house at Ruisvoornpad 51 in Hoogvliet Rotterdam (Hoogvliet Zuid neighbourhood). The home was built in 2008 and has 161 m² of living space, a 154 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label A++. The nearest railway station is Zalmplaat (626 m). The nearest primary school is De Tuimelaar (296 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced21 Jul 2026€ 549,500−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale26 Jun 2026€ 574,500
Property details
- Living area
- 161 m²
- Plot
- 154 m²
- Construction year
- 2008
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- A++
- WOZ value
- € 495,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Hoogvliet Zuid, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby23
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away14.8 km
- Distance to train station
- Station very far away13.3 km
- General practitioners within 1 km
- No GP within 1 km0.5
- Children per primary school place (proxy)
- Many children per place8.9 ratio
- Liveability class
- Weakweak
- Liveability score
- clearly below average-0.1706 score
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Spacious plot67 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of renewable energy
- High share of renewable energy97%
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions2 kg/m2/yr
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space68 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)3 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA++
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical580 m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
4 permits within 500 m · 24 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
37th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 269 pupils
Disadvantage score 90 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
2nd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 12 pupils · total 182 pupils
Disadvantage score 59 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
70th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 393 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
10th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 196 pupils
Disadvantage score 18 — more disadvantage than 57% of schools
17th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 50 pupils · total 335 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 78% of schools
53rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 58 pupils · total 563 pupils
Disadvantage score 97 — more disadvantage than 97% of schools
21st percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 212 pupils
Disadvantage score 13 — more disadvantage than 49% of schools
36th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 373 pupils
Disadvantage score 62 — more disadvantage than 90% of schools
35th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 241 pupils
Disadvantage score 33 — more disadvantage than 74% of schools
34th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 52 pupils · total 437 pupils
Disadvantage score 20 — more disadvantage than 59% of schools
6th percentile — low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.2 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 162 exam candidates
56th percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 107 exam candidates
34th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 201 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
85th percentile — high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 179 exam candidates
36th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 56 exam candidates
37th percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 199 exam candidates
96th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 69 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · VBO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.