Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
S. F. van Ossstraat 172
Apartment at S. F. van Ossstraat 172 in Amsterdam (Osdorp-Zuidoost neighbourhood). The home was built in 1965 and has 77 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Amsterdam Lelylaan (1.5 km). The nearest primary school is Oecumenische basisschool Ichthus (379 m).
Price & status history
- Under offer6 Jul 2026
- Relisted24 Jun 2026€ 350,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale10 Jun 2026€ 375,000
Property details
- Living area
- 77 m²
- Construction year
- 1965
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 405,000
- Ownership
- Leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Osdorp-Zuidoost, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress42 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby11
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside44.1%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors38.1%
- Masts within 300 m
- Many transmission masts nearby6
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away5.7 km
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot1,820 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical750 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.695 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away5.2 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)5.3 km
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Well away (>2 km)2.1 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
13 permits within 500 m · 36 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
23rd percentile — low · DIA · grade 8: 46 pupils · total 341 pupils
Disadvantage score 1 — more disadvantage than 8% of schools
3rd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 203 pupils
Disadvantage score 46 — more disadvantage than 83% of schools
17th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 244 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 78% of schools
43rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 513 pupils
Disadvantage score 71 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
22nd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 65 pupils · total 471 pupils
Disadvantage score 16 — more disadvantage than 53% of schools
8th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 299 pupils
Disadvantage score 2 — more disadvantage than 16% of schools
44th percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 352 pupils
Disadvantage score 10 — more disadvantage than 42% of schools
2nd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 216 pupils
Disadvantage score 71 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
10th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 226 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
11th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 232 pupils
Disadvantage score 54 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
3rd percentile — low · 75% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 299 exam candidates
56th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 97 exam candidates
78th percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO · 58 exam candidates
66th percentile — average · 97% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 68 exam candidates
5th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 138 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO
0th percentile — low · 59% passed · CE avg 5.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 29 exam candidates
1st percentile — low · 69% passed · CE avg 5.8 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 231 exam candidates
35th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO/PRO · 93 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.