Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Segbroeklaan 10
Apartment at Segbroeklaan 10 in 's-Gravenhage (Bomenbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1956 and has 110 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label D. The nearest railway station is Grote Markt (2.7 km). The nearest primary school is Nutsbasisschool M.M. Boldingh (334 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced22 Jul 2026€ 400,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 425,000
Property details
- Living area
- 110 m²
- Construction year
- 1956
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- D
- WOZ value
- € 465,000
- Ownership
- Municipal property burdened with leasehold (leasehold expiry date: 31-12-2027)
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Bomenbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)87.3%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure40
- Permits <500 m (3 months)
- Very high construction activity10
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)
- Deep (0.5–2 m)1.88 m
- Flood risk class
- High flood risklarge
- Shared plot
- Shared plotYes
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Elevated emissions52 kg/m2/yr
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Nearby (0.5-1 km)765 m
- Distance to military terrain
- Near military site1.2 km
- Capacity nearest WWTP
- Large treatment plant244,800 i.e.
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Multiple industrial businesses3
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Noticeably warmer1.6 °C
- Traffic on your own street
- Busy through traffic route9,000 per day
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Below the national average55.9%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot3,820 m²
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values6.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.8 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away43.6 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)48.6 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)7.9 km
- Distance to railway line
- Far from rail3.5 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
40 permits within 500 m · 16 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
95th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 227 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
88th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 58 pupils · total 458 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
80th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 310 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
93rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 300 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
98th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 238 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
59th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 216 pupils
Disadvantage score 2 — more disadvantage than 19% of schools
89th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 53 pupils · total 413 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
43rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 166 pupils
Disadvantage score 12 — more disadvantage than 47% of schools
98th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 231 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
99th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 401 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
34th percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 161 exam candidates
9th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO · 116 exam candidates
77th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.5 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 87 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
28th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 103 exam candidates
18th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 171 exam candidates
99th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 7.0 · VWO · 114 exam candidates
20th percentile — low · 90% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 52 exam candidates
45th percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO · 22 exam candidates
93rd percentile — high · 91% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VWO · 115 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.