Price drops in and around Haarlem
More homes in and around Haarlem whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Spijkerboorweg 411
Apartment at Spijkerboorweg 411 in Haarlem (Spijkerboorbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 2023 and has 88 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A+++. The nearest railway station is Haarlem Spaarnwoude (2.6 km). The nearest primary school is Al Ikhlaas (139 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted13 Jul 2026€ 525,000−€ 5,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 530,000
Property details
- Living area
- 88 m²
- Construction year
- 2023
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A+++
- WOZ value
- € 550,000
- Ownership
- Property subject to building rights (opstal)
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Spijkerboorbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance8.8%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby8
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside42.8%
- Share of social rental housing in the neighbourhood
- Predominantly social rental65%
- Severe loneliness (neighbourhood)
- High19.9%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated170 persons
- Liveability class
- Weakweak
- Liveability score
- clearly below average-0.2278 score
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot630 m²
- Share of renewable energy
- High share of renewable energy89%
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions1 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)6 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA+++
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical660 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values8.5%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.735 µg/m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
6 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 9 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
39th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 363 pupils
Disadvantage score 69 — more disadvantage than 92% of schools
16th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 243 pupils
Disadvantage score 29 — more disadvantage than 71% of schools
15th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 52 pupils · total 365 pupils
Disadvantage score 104 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
14th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 360 pupils
Disadvantage score 86 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
11th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 10 pupils · total 209 pupils
Disadvantage score 14 — more disadvantage than 50% of schools
68th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 360 pupils
Disadvantage score 39 — more disadvantage than 78% of schools
37th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 155 pupils
Disadvantage score 40 — more disadvantage than 79% of schools
8th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 8 pupils · total 305 pupils
Disadvantage score 76 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
3rd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 49 pupils · total 423 pupils
Disadvantage score 6 — more disadvantage than 31% of schools
29th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 435 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
35th percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 152 exam candidates
56th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 167 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO
no exam results · HAVO
83rd percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.5 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 7 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
94th percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VWO · 203 exam candidates
13th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO · 77 exam candidates
96th percentile — high · 95% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VWO · 126 exam candidates
27th percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 262 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.