Price drops in and around Hoogvliet Rotterdam
More homes in and around Hoogvliet Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Texasweg 8
Terraced house at Texasweg 8 in Hoogvliet Rotterdam (Hoogvliet Noord neighbourhood). The home was built in 1954 and has 107 m² of living space, a 125 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label E. The nearest railway station is Hoogvliet (1.6 km). The nearest primary school is Basisschool Het Prisma (520 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted22 Jul 2026€ 335,000−€ 15,000
- Listed for sale9 Jun 2026€ 350,000
Property details
- Living area
- 107 m²
- Plot
- 125 m²
- Construction year
- 1954
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- E
- WOZ value
- € 306,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Hoogvliet Noord, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress43 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby37
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby10
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away15 km
- Distance to train station
- Station very far away12.4 km
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Spacious plot71 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space72 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical740 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential5,164 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,026 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low2.143 µg/m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
7 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 27 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
13th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 275 pupils
Disadvantage score 50 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
21st percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 212 pupils
Disadvantage score 13 — more disadvantage than 49% of schools
22nd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 253 pupils
Disadvantage score 51 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
17th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 50 pupils · total 335 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 78% of schools
56th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 426 pupils
Disadvantage score 34 — more disadvantage than 75% of schools
2nd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 12 pupils · total 182 pupils
Disadvantage score 59 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
37th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 269 pupils
Disadvantage score 90 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
34th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 52 pupils · total 437 pupils
Disadvantage score 20 — more disadvantage than 59% of schools
53rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 58 pupils · total 563 pupils
Disadvantage score 97 — more disadvantage than 97% of schools
39th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 446 pupils
Disadvantage score 51 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
no exam results · PRO
56th percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 107 exam candidates
6th percentile — low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.2 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 162 exam candidates
36th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 56 exam candidates
34th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 201 exam candidates
85th percentile — high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 179 exam candidates
37th percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 199 exam candidates
96th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 69 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.