Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
24/07/2026 | Zwetstraat 60 Den Haag | € 260.000 € 250.000 | -3.9% | 50 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Thomsonlaan 206 Den Haag | € 550.000 € 495.000 | -10.0% | 122 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Rijswijkseweg 71 C Den Haag | € 369.000 € 349.000 | -5.4% | 94 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Zwartendijk 29 Monster | € 1.129.000 € 1.095.000 | -3.0% | 236 m²1015 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Pisuissestraat 75 Den Haag | € 420.000 € 400.000 | -4.8% | 112 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Louis Couperusplein 52 Den Haag | € 840.000 € 829.500 | -1.3% | 153 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Volmerlaan 4 F035 Rijswijk (ZH) | € 309.500 € 300.000 | -3.1% | 53 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Kerkweg 14 Pijnacker | € 400.000 € 379.000 | -5.3% | 103 m²182 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Mient 138 Den Haag | € 325.000 € 300.000 | -7.7% | 70 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Erasmusweg 1903 Den Haag | € 550.000 € 500.000 | -9.1% | 156 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Kaapstraat 80 Den Haag | € 285.000 € 275.000 | -3.5% | 82 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Buizerdlaan 213 Leidschendam | € 525.000 € 499.000 | -5.0% | 83 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Segbroeklaan 10 Den Haag | € 425.000 € 400.000 | -5.9% | 109 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Tollenspark 15 's-Gravenzande | € 770.000 € 750.000 | -2.6% | 156 m²213 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Van Loostraat 116 Den Haag | € 775.000 € 725.000 | -6.5% | 138 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | San Franciscosingel 10 Den Haag | € 850.000 € 800.000 | -5.9% | 199 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Zeesluisweg 62 D Den Haag | € 560.000 € 524.500 | -6.3% | 75 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Aart van der Leeuwlaan 84 Delft | € 370.000 € 360.000 | -2.7% | 104 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Newtonplein 21 A Den Haag | € 239.500 € 219.500 | -8.3% | 29 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Kievitstraat 11 Honselersdijk | € 445.000 € 422.500 | -5.1% | 88 m²134 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Thomsonlaan 206
Apartment at Thomsonlaan 206 in 's-Gravenhage (Bloemenbuurt-Oost neighbourhood). The home was built in 1921 and has 121 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Grote Markt (3.1 km). The nearest primary school is Christelijke Montessorischool De Abeel (255 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted24 Jul 2026€ 495,000−€ 55,000
- Listed for sale19 Jun 2026€ 550,000
Property details
- Living area
- 121 m²
- Construction year
- 1921
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 465,000
- Ownership
- Municipal leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Bloemenbuurt-Oost, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- Low share renewable7%
- Residents in 100m grid cellⓘ
- Very densely populated240 persons
- Distance to interchange stationⓘ
- Far away5.4 km
- Permits <500 m (12 months)ⓘ
- Much building pressure71
- Permits <500 m (3 months)ⓘ
- Very high construction activity14
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Urban heat island effectⓘ
- Strong heat island1.9 °C
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)ⓘ
- Deep (0.5–2 m)0.9 m
- Flood risk classⓘ
- High flood risklarge
- Shared plotⓘ
- Shared plotYes
- Share of homes with solar powerⓘ
- Few solar panels8%
- Calculated CO₂ emissionsⓘ
- Elevated emissions51 kg/m2/yr
- Distance to nearest transmission mastⓘ
- Transmission mast nearby (<100 m)20 m
- Distance to military terrainⓘ
- Near military site1.9 km
- Capacity nearest WWTPⓘ
- Large treatment plant244,800 i.e.
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Multiple industrial businesses3
- PFAS standard breach within 10 kmⓘ
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Able to find cooling in the propertyⓘ
- Below the national average49.6%
- Radio mast on own propertyⓘ
- Mast on or against own propertyYes
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values6.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂ⓘ
- Very low0.827 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facilityⓘ
- Far away43.6 km
- Distance to biomass plantⓘ
- At distance (>3 km)48.2 km
- Distance to nearest emission sourceⓘ
- ample distance1.3 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbineⓘ
- Far away (>2 km)8.3 km
- Distance to railway lineⓘ
- Far from rail3.6 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
65 permits within 500 m · 15 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
80th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 310 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
93rd percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 300 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
59th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 216 pupils
Disadvantage score 2: more disadvantage than 19% of schools
72nd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 187 pupils
Disadvantage score 48: more disadvantage than 84% of schools
98th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 231 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
98th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 238 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
91st percentile: high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 52 pupils · total 378 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
43rd percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 166 pupils
Disadvantage score 12: more disadvantage than 47% of schools
92nd percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 50 pupils · total 456 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
7th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 14 pupils · total 98 pupils
Disadvantage score 31: more disadvantage than 73% of schools
18th percentile: low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 171 exam candidates
34th percentile: average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 161 exam candidates
19th percentile: low · 85% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 225 exam candidates
9th percentile: low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO · 116 exam candidates
28th percentile: average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 103 exam candidates
77th percentile: high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.5 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 87 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
3rd percentile: low · 78% passed · CE avg 6.1 · HAVO/VWO · 157 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
13th percentile: low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 102 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.