Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Van Alkemadelaan 70
Terraced house at Van Alkemadelaan 70 in 's-Gravenhage (Arendsdorp neighbourhood). The home was built in 1932 and has 225 m² of living space, a 191 m² plot, 7 bedrooms and energy label E. The nearest railway station is Centraal Station (1.6 km). The nearest primary school is Benoordenhout (499 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced24 Jul 2026€ 1,190,000−€ 55,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 1,245,000
Property details
- Living area
- 225 m²
- Plot
- 191 m²
- Construction year
- 1932
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 7
- Energy label
- E
- WOZ value
- € 1,140,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Arendsdorp, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable4%
- Distance to business district
- Adjacent to business park49 m
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure42
- Permits <500 m (3 months)
- Very high construction activity8
- Distance to military terrain
- On/directly adjacent to military site0.1 km
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)
- Severely disruptive56 dB
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Traffic on your own street
- Very busy (main/motorway)13,500 per day
- Average lowest groundwater level (GLG)
- Deep, risk of pile rot254 m above sea level
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)
- Deep (0.5–2 m)1.75 m
- Flood risk class
- High flood risklarge
- Share of homes with solar power
- Few solar panels10%
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Elevated emissions58 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Inefficient (label E)318 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- UneconomicalE
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Above average1,140 m³
- Distance to groundwater protection area
- Adjacent to protected area30 m
- Noise load
- Heavy65 dB
- Estimated sun hours (winter)
- Virtually no winter sun0 hour
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Multiple industrial businesses5
- Environmental health risk (MGR)
- Elevated6.2%
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Spacious plot94 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space132 m²
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential9,555 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,032 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values6.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.796 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away42 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
37 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 9 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
96th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 220 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
94th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 58 pupils · total 429 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
93rd percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 285 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
99th percentile: high · DOE · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 432 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
87th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 296 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
53rd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 163 pupils
Disadvantage score 11: more disadvantage than 45% of schools
92nd percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 49 pupils · total 401 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
84th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 232 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
98th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 213 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
52nd percentile: average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 191 pupils
Disadvantage score 53: more disadvantage than 86% of schools
61st percentile: average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.6 · HAVO/VWO · 175 exam candidates
61st percentile: average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 69 exam candidates
22nd percentile: low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 225 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
52nd percentile: average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.5 · HAVO/VWO · 136 exam candidates
5th percentile: low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.1 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 116 exam candidates
5th percentile: low · 79% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 130 exam candidates
95th percentile: high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 71 exam candidates
12th percentile: low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/PRO · 79 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.