Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Van Hallstraat 39 3
Apartment at Van Hallstraat 39 in Amsterdam (Westerstaatsman neighbourhood). The home was built in 1906 and has 41 m² of living space, 1 bedroom and energy label E. The nearest railway station is Isolatorweg (1.8 km). The nearest primary school is Oecumenische basisschool De Catamaran (95 m).
Price & status history
- Under offer8 Jul 2026
- Relisted22 Jun 2026€ 399,000−€ 46,000
- Listed for sale13 Jun 2026€ 445,000
Property details
- Living area
- 41 m²
- Construction year
- 1906
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 1
- Energy label
- E
- WOZ value
- € 436,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Westerstaatsman, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance10.2%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby23
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island1.9 °C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside38.2%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors32.1%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Leasehold or freehold
- FreeholdNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical590 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.627 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away5.6 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)3 km
- Distance to nearest transmission mast
- No transmitter mast in the neighbourhood302 m
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
38 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 50 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
96th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 152 pupils
Disadvantage score 0 — more disadvantage than 0% of schools
15th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 113 pupils
Disadvantage score 24 — more disadvantage than 64% of schools
68th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 169 pupils
Disadvantage score 25 — more disadvantage than 65% of schools
14th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 216 pupils
Disadvantage score 48 — more disadvantage than 84% of schools
79th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 407 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
53rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 6 pupils · total 205 pupils
Disadvantage score 23 — more disadvantage than 63% of schools
71st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 346 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
36th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 53 pupils · total 390 pupils
Disadvantage score 0 — more disadvantage than 2% of schools
83rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 316 pupils
Disadvantage score 7 — more disadvantage than 34% of schools
75th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 272 pupils
Disadvantage score 15 — more disadvantage than 52% of schools
1st percentile — low · 67% passed · CE avg 5.9 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 102 exam candidates
10th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 94 exam candidates
60th percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VWO · 111 exam candidates
19th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 70 exam candidates
43rd percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO · 35 exam candidates
18th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 99 exam candidates
29th percentile — average · 85% passed · CE avg 6.5 · HAVO/VWO · 130 exam candidates
91st percentile — high · 92% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VWO · 109 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 52% passed · CE avg 5.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 33 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 61% passed · CE avg 5.5 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 89 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.