Price drops in and around Schiedam
More homes in and around Schiedam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Van 's-Gravesandestraat 26 B
Terraced house at Van 's-Gravesandestraat 26 in Schiedam (Newtonbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1933 and has 98 m² of living space, a 125 m² plot, 2 bedrooms and energy label D. The nearest railway station is Schiedam Centrum (758 m). The nearest primary school is Basisschool de Peperklip (363 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted24 Jul 2026€ 299,000−€ 1,000
- Listed for sale2 Jun 2026€ 300,000
Property details
- Living area
- 98 m²
- Plot
- 125 m²
- Construction year
- 1933
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- D
- WOZ value
- € 279,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Newtonbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Share of persons in poverty
- High poverty11.7%
- Severe loneliness (neighbourhood)
- High18.8%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated235 persons
- Liveability class
- Weakweak
- Liveability score
- clearly below average-0.2215 score
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safety
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.1843 score
- Obesity (neighbourhood)
- High17.6%
- Smokers (neighbourhood)
- Many smokers28.6%
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)72.4%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)62.1%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure6
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- Multiple within 1 km2
- Distance to airport
- Directly next to airport4.8 km
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance9.2%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.2%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby23
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby17
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island2.2 °C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside33.3%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors35.3%
- Number of risk sources within 1 km
- Many sources7
- Number of hazardous installations (REV) within 1 km
- Cluster of risky facilities nearby6
- Foundation risk
- High risklarge
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)
- Deep (0.5–2 m)1.1 m
- Flood risk class
- High flood risklarge
- Share of homes with solar power
- Few solar panels3%
- Distance to nearest transmission mast
- Transmission mast nearby (<100 m)90 m
- Distance to nearest external safety facility
- Nearby (within area of influence)727 m
- Distance to nearest high-voltage power line
- Near high-voltage line85 m
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)
- Elevated1.3%
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Voltage level of nearest line
- Heavier line (150 kV)150 kV
- Proportion of flexible employment contracts
- Much flexible work48.1%· NL 27%
- Share of households lowest 40% income
- above-average many low incomes54.2%
- Share of unemployment benefit
- Elevated1.8%· NL 1%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Spacious plot68 m²
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space60 m²
- Solar potential roof
- Strong potential4,241 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,003 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values10.2%
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low1.351 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away24.9 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)27.7 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
6 permits · 2 construction plans within 500 m · 29 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
28th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 348 pupils
Disadvantage score 86: more disadvantage than 96% of schools
no recent test score · total 114 pupils
Disadvantage score 11: more disadvantage than 45% of schools
18th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 179 pupils
Disadvantage score 34: more disadvantage than 75% of schools
11th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 11 pupils · total 121 pupils
Disadvantage score 31: more disadvantage than 73% of schools
17th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 51 pupils · total 452 pupils
Disadvantage score 86: more disadvantage than 96% of schools
7th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 40 pupils · total 291 pupils
Disadvantage score 90: more disadvantage than 97% of schools
10th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 434 pupils
Disadvantage score 68: more disadvantage than 92% of schools
93rd percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 237 pupils
Disadvantage score 72: more disadvantage than 93% of schools
69th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 63 pupils · total 609 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
59th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 149 pupils
Disadvantage score 52: more disadvantage than 85% of schools
34th percentile: average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 111 exam candidates
19th percentile: low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 129 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
28th percentile: average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 145 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
65th percentile: average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 35 exam candidates
43rd percentile: average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 168 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
18th percentile: low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 192 exam candidates
13th percentile: low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 177 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.