Price drops in and around Nijmegen
More homes in and around Nijmegen whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
van Spaenstraat 20 B
Apartment at van Spaenstraat 20 in Nijmegen (Galgenveld neighbourhood). The home was built in 1902 and has 254 m² of living space, 1 bedroom and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Nijmegen (787 m). The nearest primary school is Vrijeschool Meander (217 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted19 Jun 2026€ 375,000−€ 45,000
- For sale3 Jun 2026
- Off funda27 May 2026€ 420,000
Property details
- Living area
- 254 m²
- Construction year
- 1902
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 1
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- —
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Galgenveld, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby17
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby6
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island1.9 °C
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors42.3%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated175 persons
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)85.7%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar power
- Above average27%
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)135 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values10.1%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.614 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away17.5 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)9.5 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
5 permits within 500 m · 14 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
74th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 449 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
75th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 231 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
88th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 61 pupils · total 395 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
20th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 190 pupils
Disadvantage score 35 — more disadvantage than 75% of schools
87th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 224 pupils
Disadvantage score 0 — more disadvantage than 8% of schools
100th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 212 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
61st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 211 pupils
Disadvantage score 6 — more disadvantage than 32% of schools
89th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 224 pupils
Disadvantage score 14 — more disadvantage than 50% of schools
18th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 226 pupils
Disadvantage score 13 — more disadvantage than 49% of schools
60th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 315 pupils
Disadvantage score 53 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
62nd percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.6 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 135 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO
81st percentile — high · 92% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VWO · 154 exam candidates
53rd percentile — average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 167 exam candidates
77th percentile — high · 96% passed · CE avg 6.6 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 352 exam candidates
21st percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 54 exam candidates
69th percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 113 exam candidates
26th percentile — average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 245 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
51st percentile — average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 262 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.