Price drops in and around Eindhoven
More homes in and around Eindhoven whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Veldmaarschalk Montgomerylaan 33
Apartment at Veldmaarschalk Montgomerylaan 33 in Eindhoven (Gildebuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 2001 and has 125 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Eindhoven Centraal (393 m). The nearest primary school is Fellenoord (264 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced10 Jul 2026€ 600,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale13 Jun 2026€ 625,000
Property details
- Living area
- 125 m²
- Construction year
- 2001
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 558,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Gildebuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.1%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby12
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby8
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island2.3 °C
- Nitrogen deposition in the neighbourhood
- High nitrogen deposition1,711.2 mol/ha/yr
- Traffic on your own street
- Very busy (main/motorway)13,500 per day
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside31.6%
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot1,773 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)115 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.646 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away65.6 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)13.7 km
- Distance to military terrain
- Well away from military terrain5.2 km
- Distance to overhead high-voltage line
- Well away2,848 m
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
14 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 49 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
79th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 12 pupils · total 126 pupils
Disadvantage score 43 — more disadvantage than 81% of schools
22nd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 384 pupils
Disadvantage score 11 — more disadvantage than 45% of schools
99th percentile — high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 167 pupils
Disadvantage score 10 — more disadvantage than 42% of schools
71st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 399 pupils
Disadvantage score 44 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
49th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 56 pupils · total 539 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
73rd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 52 pupils · total 966 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
59th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 46 pupils · total 308 pupils
Disadvantage score 60 — more disadvantage than 90% of schools
72nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 216 pupils
Disadvantage score 10 — more disadvantage than 42% of schools
76th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 272 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
73rd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 200 pupils
Disadvantage score 55 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
no exam results · PRO
44th percentile — average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO · 103 exam candidates
64th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO · 118 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO
29th percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO/HAVO · 141 exam candidates
31st percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 145 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO
94th percentile — high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 116 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.