Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Vlamingstraat 36 B
Apartment at Vlamingstraat 36 in 's-Gravenhage (Zuidwal neighbourhood). The home was built in 1899 and has 78 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label E. The nearest railway station is Grote Markt (71 m). The nearest primary school is Zuidwalschool (442 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted25 Jul 2026€ 375,000−€ 24,500
- Listed for sale23 Jun 2026€ 399,500
Property details
- Living area
- 78 m²
- Construction year
- 1899
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- E
- WOZ value
- € 350,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Zuidwal, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Severe loneliness (neighbourhood)
- High19%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated120 persons
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safety
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.244 score
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)
- high share19.3%
- High stress (neighbourhood)
- Much stress28.2%
- Green share within 500 m
- Little greenery2%
- Hospitality within 25 m
- Hospitality within 25 m4
- Catering within 300 m
- Very many catering businesses, nightlife area143
- Crimes per 1,000 residents
- High crime304.2 per 1,000 residents
- Parking tariff
- Very high rate€ 7.15
- Score nearest primary school (percentile)
- Low (bottom quarter)4%
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)75.8%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)69.5%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure104
- Permits <500 m (3 months)
- Very high construction activity21
- Distance to military terrain
- On/directly adjacent to military site0.5 km
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance9.1%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby6
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island2.5 °C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside36.7%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors34.3%
- Masts within 300 m
- Many transmission masts nearby11
- Number of hazardous installations (REV) within 1 km
- Cluster of risky facilities nearby4
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)
- Deep (0.5–2 m)0.98 m
- Flood risk class
- High flood risklarge
- Shared plot
- Shared plotYes
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Small plot79 m²
- Share of homes with solar power
- Few solar panels2%
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Elevated emissions54 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Inefficient (label E)297 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- UneconomicalE
- Distance to nearest transmission mast
- Transmission mast nearby (<100 m)95 m
- Within Wbb soil location
- Within registered soil locationYes
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Multiple sources4
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical520 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values6.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.902 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away41.3 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)46.9 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)5.3 km
- Distance to railway line
- Far from rail1.1 km
- Distance to overhead high-voltage line
- Well away2,901 m
- Distance to nearest high-voltage power line
- Far from high voltage1.2 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
101 permits within 500 m · 29 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
4th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 272 pupils
Disadvantage score 108: more disadvantage than 98% of schools
38th percentile: average · DIA · grade 8: 49 pupils · total 378 pupils
Disadvantage score 72: more disadvantage than 93% of schools
75th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 173 pupils
Disadvantage score 58: more disadvantage than 89% of schools
53rd percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 85 pupils · total 260 pupils
Disadvantage score 55: more disadvantage than 87% of schools
31st percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 175 pupils
Disadvantage score 51: more disadvantage than 85% of schools
no recent test score · total 36 pupils
Disadvantage score 7: more disadvantage than 35% of schools
6th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 282 pupils
Disadvantage score 103: more disadvantage than 98% of schools
4th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 137 pupils
Disadvantage score 57: more disadvantage than 88% of schools
20th percentile: low · DIA · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 265 pupils
Disadvantage score 98: more disadvantage than 98% of schools
27th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 70 pupils · total 633 pupils
Disadvantage score 208: more disadvantage than 100% of schools
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
90th percentile: high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.6 · HAVO/VWO · 6 exam candidates
2nd percentile: low · 79% passed · CE avg 5.9 · VBO · 76 exam candidates
5th percentile: low · 79% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 130 exam candidates
0th percentile: low · 57% passed · CE avg 5.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 221 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
93rd percentile: high · 91% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VWO · 115 exam candidates
22nd percentile: low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 225 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
52nd percentile: average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.5 · HAVO/VWO · 136 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.