Price drops in and around Rijswijk (ZH)
More homes in and around Rijswijk (ZH) whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Volmerlaan 4 F035
Apartment at Volmerlaan 4 in Rijswijk (Plaspoelpolder neighbourhood). The home was built in 2001 and has 784 m² of living space, 1 bedroom and energy label A++. The nearest railway station is Rijswijk (313 m). The nearest primary school is Basisschool De Piramide (473 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted23 Jul 2026€ 300,000−€ 9,500
- Sold10 Jun 2026€ 309,500
Property details
- Living area
- 784 m²
- Construction year
- 2001
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 1
- Energy label
- A++
- WOZ value
- € 292,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Plaspoelpolder, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of persons in poverty
- High poverty13.9%
- Distance to business district
- Adjacent to business park0 m
- Crimes per 1,000 residents
- High crime242 per 1,000 residents
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)83.7%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)82.7%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.5%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress42 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby12
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Average highest groundwater level (GHG)
- Very high groundwater23 m above sea level
- Shared plot
- Shared plotYes
- Share of renewable energy
- moderate share sustainable42%
- Share of homes with solar power
- Few solar panels5%
- Distance to railway line
- Close to railway298 m
- Distance to airport
- Nearby11.9 km
- Within Wbb soil location
- Within registered soil locationYes
- Noise load
- Heavy62 dB
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)
- Disturbing53 dB
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- Elevated1.2%
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)
- Elevated3.3%
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot1,897 m²
- Plan status
- Finalfinal
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions16 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)68 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA++
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical500 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values10.6%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.949 µg/m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
3 permits · 2 construction plans within 500 m · 36 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
38th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 327 pupils
Disadvantage score 52: more disadvantage than 85% of schools
13th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 211 pupils
Disadvantage score 57: more disadvantage than 88% of schools
83rd percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 139 pupils
Disadvantage score 4: more disadvantage than 24% of schools
65th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 40 pupils · total 323 pupils
Disadvantage score 37: more disadvantage than 77% of schools
40th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 50 pupils · total 424 pupils
Disadvantage score 33: more disadvantage than 74% of schools
80th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 53 pupils · total 432 pupils
Disadvantage score 19: more disadvantage than 59% of schools
58th percentile: average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 299 pupils
Disadvantage score 68: more disadvantage than 92% of schools
23rd percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 165 pupils
Disadvantage score 24: more disadvantage than 64% of schools
58th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 198 pupils
Disadvantage score 63: more disadvantage than 91% of schools
12th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 335 pupils
Disadvantage score 45: more disadvantage than 82% of schools
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/PRO
7th percentile: low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 115 exam candidates
45th percentile: average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 27 exam candidates
26th percentile: average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 81 exam candidates
27th percentile: average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 161 exam candidates
75th percentile: average · 100% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/PRO · 12 exam candidates
44th percentile: average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 227 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
49th percentile: average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 100 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.