Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Von Zesenstraat 360
Apartment at Von Zesenstraat 360 in Amsterdam (Dapperbuurt-Noord neighbourhood). The home was built in 1981 and has 55 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Amsterdam Muiderpoort (465 m). The nearest primary school is De Indische Buurt School (312 m).
Price & status history
- Under offer18 Jul 2026
- Relisted3 Jul 2026€ 475,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 500,000
Property details
- Living area
- 55 m²
- Construction year
- 1981
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 504,000
- Ownership
- Municipal property encumbered with leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Dapperbuurt-Noord, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance8.9%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island2.1 °C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside36.9%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors35.4%
- Share of social rental housing in the neighbourhood
- Predominantly social rental59%
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot2,209 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical590 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.572 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away10 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)6.9 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)6.8 km
- Distance to overhead high-voltage line
- Well away3,740 m
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
51 permits within 500 m · 50 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
49th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 346 pupils
Disadvantage score 65 — more disadvantage than 91% of schools
30th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 104 pupils
Disadvantage score 44 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
79th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 421 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
88th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 331 pupils
Disadvantage score 17 — more disadvantage than 55% of schools
14th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 293 pupils
Disadvantage score 54 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
47th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 176 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
57th percentile — average · DOE · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 217 pupils
Disadvantage score 7 — more disadvantage than 33% of schools
98th percentile — high · DIA · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 248 pupils
Disadvantage score 26 — more disadvantage than 67% of schools
8th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 221 pupils
Disadvantage score 80 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
34th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 309 pupils
Disadvantage score 49 — more disadvantage than 84% of schools
4th percentile — low · 78% passed · CE avg 6.1 · HAVO · 64 exam candidates
18th percentile — low · 88% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO/PRO · 102 exam candidates
84th percentile — high · 96% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 154 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · VBO/PRO
58th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 33 exam candidates
92nd percentile — high · 93% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VWO · 116 exam candidates
90th percentile — high · 95% passed · CE avg 6.8 · MAVO · 58 exam candidates
12th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 105 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.