Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Ward Bingleystraat 91
Terraced house at Ward Bingleystraat 91 in Amsterdam (Jacques Veltmanbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1959 and has 64 m² of living space, a 88 m² plot, 3 bedrooms and energy label D. The nearest railway station is Heemstedestraat (459 m). The nearest primary school is Louis Bouwmeesterschool (535 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted6 Jun 2026€ 550,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 575,000
Property details
- Living area
- 64 m²
- Plot
- 88 m²
- Construction year
- 1959
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- D
- WOZ value
- € 546,000
- Ownership
- Municipal property encumbered with leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Jacques Veltmanbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance9.1%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby10
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside35.3%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors35%
- Aircraft movements per hour (nearest airport)
- Very busy54.1 per hour
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space43 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical550 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Strong potential3,473 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,004 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.669 µg/m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
9 permits within 500 m · 37 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
3rd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 203 pupils
Disadvantage score 46 — more disadvantage than 83% of schools
12th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 73 pupils
Disadvantage score 23 — more disadvantage than 63% of schools
6th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 292 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
22nd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 65 pupils · total 471 pupils
Disadvantage score 16 — more disadvantage than 53% of schools
47th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 332 pupils
Disadvantage score 52 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
8th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 299 pupils
Disadvantage score 2 — more disadvantage than 16% of schools
3rd percentile — low · DIA · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 161 pupils
Disadvantage score 58 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
71st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 250 pupils
Disadvantage score 6 — more disadvantage than 31% of schools
87th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 71 pupils · total 533 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
23rd percentile — low · DIA · grade 8: 46 pupils · total 341 pupils
Disadvantage score 1 — more disadvantage than 8% of schools
66th percentile — average · 97% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 68 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
5th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 138 exam candidates
56th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 97 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO
1st percentile — low · 69% passed · CE avg 5.8 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 231 exam candidates
72nd percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO · 38 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 59% passed · CE avg 5.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 29 exam candidates
3rd percentile — low · 75% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 299 exam candidates
35th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO/PRO · 93 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.