Price drops in and around Krommenie
More homes in and around Krommenie whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
23/07/2026 | De Faam 22 Zaandam | € 900.000 € 865.000 | -3.9% | 174 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | De Lumeystraat 40 IJmuiden | € 550.000 € 525.000 | -4.5% | 152 m²188 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Laan der Nederlanden 66 A Beverwijk | € 422.500 € 400.000 | -5.3% | 124 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Ladderbeekstraat 33 Velsen-Noord | € 425.000 € 389.000 | -8.5% | 81 m²102 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Rode Zee 31 Zaandam | € 450.000 € 375.000 | -16.7% | 125 m²121 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Pitrus 88 Assendelft | € 699.500 € 669.500 | -4.3% | 141 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Overtoom 17 Westzaan | € 470.000 € 419.500 | -10.7% | 112 m²89 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Driehuizen 20 Driehuizen | € 995.000 € 970.000 | -2.5% | 184 m²345 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Koningsvarenstraat 65 Wormer | € 425.000 € 415.000 | -2.4% | 100 m²211 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Appartement type C 85 Assendelft | € 699.500 € 669.500 | -4.3% | 141 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Spinozahof 15 Krommenie | € 425.000 € 400.000 | -5.9% | 111 m²145 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Harpraam 45 Krommenie | € 625.000 € 599.000 | -4.2% | 105 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Eksterlaan 124 Haarlem | € 335.000 € 325.000 | -3.0% | 62 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | Spaansgroenstraat 46 Zaandam | € 290.000 € 280.000 | -3.5% | 79 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | Reigerstraat 83 Zaandam | € 375.000 € 365.000 | -2.7% | 74 m²119 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | Conradwerf 199 Zaandam | € 489.000 € 475.000 | -2.9% | 88 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | Dorpsstraat 167 Assendelft | € 475.000 € 425.000 | -10.5% | 87 m²370 m² | |||
14/07/2026 | Vurehout 158 Zaandam | € 385.000 € 350.000 | -9.1% | 64 m²57 m² | |||
13/07/2026 | Zeemansstraat 24 C Zaandam | € 300.000 € 289.000 | -3.7% | 55 m² | |||
13/07/2026 | Eilandspolder kavel 318 De Rijp | € 47.500 € 39.500 | -16.8% | — |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Weiver 35
Detached at Weiver 35 in Krommenie (Zuiderhoofdbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1920 and has 113 m² of living space, a 335 m² plot, 3 bedrooms and energy label G. The nearest railway station is Krommenie-Assendelft (944 m). The nearest primary school is Rooms Katholieke Jenaplanschool De Bijenkorf (811 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced24 Jul 2026€ 399,000−€ 26,000
- Listed for sale27 May 2026€ 425,000
Property details
- Living area
- 113 m²
- Plot
- 335 m²
- Construction year
- 1920
- Property type
- Detached
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- G
- WOZ value
- € 482,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Zuiderhoofdbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Calculated CO₂ emissionsⓘ
- High emissions10,472 kg/m2/yr
- Energy labelⓘ
- PoorG
- Distance to interchange stationⓘ
- Far away8.8 km
- Distance to business districtⓘ
- Adjacent to business park40 m
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)86.6%
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facilityⓘ
- Very close (<500 m)466 m
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)ⓘ
- High4.1%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High1.9%
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)ⓘ
- High4.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High3.1%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby8
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Number of hazardous installations (REV) within 1 kmⓘ
- Cluster of risky facilities nearby5
- Foundation riskⓘ
- High risklarge
- Average highest groundwater level (GHG)ⓘ
- Very high groundwater19 m above sea level
- Groundwater table (Gt)ⓘ
- Very wet (high groundwater level)IIa
- In area with induced earthquakesⓘ
- In earthquake zoneYes
- Flood risk classⓘ
- High flood risklarge
- Distance to tram/metro lineⓘ
- Far away12.4 km
- Serious noise nuisance from trains (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Heavy train noise2.4%
- Serious noise nuisance from aircraft (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- High flight nuisance18.1%
- Fine dust (PM2.5)ⓘ
- Elevated12.2 µg/m³
- Odour nuisance from wood burning (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- Elevated4.4%
- Industrial emitters within 2 kmⓘ
- Multiple sources4
- Environmental health risk (MGR)ⓘ
- Elevated7.1%
- PFAS standard breach within 10 kmⓘ
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Urban heat island effectⓘ
- Noticeably warmer1.4 °C
- Can find cooling outside the homeⓘ
- Below the national average51.7%
- Building coverage percentageⓘ
- Plenty of open land23%
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plotⓘ
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot areaⓘ
- Very spacious plot259 m²
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar powerⓘ
- Above average27%
- Usable roof area for solar panelsⓘ
- Ample roof space86 m²
- Solar potential roofⓘ
- Very high potential6,082 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWpⓘ
- Excellent yield1,015 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values8%
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
20 permits · 66 construction plans within 500 m · 40 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
69th percentile: average · DOE · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 278 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
60th percentile: average · DOE · grade 8: 51 pupils · total 580 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
44th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 53 pupils · total 461 pupils
Disadvantage score 95: more disadvantage than 97% of schools
10th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 297 pupils
Disadvantage score 76: more disadvantage than 94% of schools
87th percentile: high · DOE · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 125 pupils
Disadvantage score 20: more disadvantage than 59% of schools
30th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 50 pupils · total 271 pupils
Disadvantage score 5: more disadvantage than 28% of schools
90th percentile: high · DOE · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 151 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
63rd percentile: average · DOE · grade 8: 51 pupils · total 340 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
24th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 260 pupils
Disadvantage score 7: more disadvantage than 34% of schools
75th percentile: high · DOE · grade 8: 77 pupils · total 624 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
20th percentile: low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 134 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
32nd percentile: average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 316 exam candidates
63rd percentile: average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 158 exam candidates
65th percentile: average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.5 · HAVO/VWO · 218 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.