Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
24/07/2026 | Westduinweg 54 A Den Haag | € 435.000 € 395.000 | -9.2% | 81 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Van Alkemadelaan 70 Den Haag | € 1.245.000 € 1.190.000 | -4.4% | 233 m²191 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Zwetstraat 60 Den Haag | € 260.000 € 250.000 | -3.9% | 50 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Thomsonlaan 206 Den Haag | € 550.000 € 495.000 | -10.0% | 122 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Rijswijkseweg 71 C Den Haag | € 369.000 € 349.000 | -5.4% | 94 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Zwartendijk 29 Monster | € 1.129.000 € 1.095.000 | -3.0% | 236 m²1015 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Pisuissestraat 75 Den Haag | € 420.000 € 400.000 | -4.8% | 112 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Louis Couperusplein 52 Den Haag | € 840.000 € 829.500 | -1.3% | 153 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Volmerlaan 4 F035 Rijswijk (ZH) | € 309.500 € 300.000 | -3.1% | 53 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Kerkweg 14 Pijnacker | € 400.000 € 379.000 | -5.3% | 103 m²182 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Mient 138 Den Haag | € 325.000 € 300.000 | -7.7% | 70 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Erasmusweg 1903 Den Haag | € 550.000 € 500.000 | -9.1% | 156 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Kaapstraat 80 Den Haag | € 285.000 € 275.000 | -3.5% | 82 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Buizerdlaan 213 Leidschendam | € 525.000 € 499.000 | -5.0% | 83 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Segbroeklaan 10 Den Haag | € 425.000 € 400.000 | -5.9% | 109 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Tollenspark 15 's-Gravenzande | € 770.000 € 750.000 | -2.6% | 156 m²213 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Van Loostraat 116 Den Haag | € 775.000 € 725.000 | -6.5% | 138 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | San Franciscosingel 10 Den Haag | € 850.000 € 800.000 | -5.9% | 199 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Zeesluisweg 62 D Den Haag | € 560.000 € 524.500 | -6.3% | 75 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Aart van der Leeuwlaan 84 Delft | € 370.000 € 360.000 | -2.7% | 104 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Westduinweg 54 A
Apartment at Westduinweg 54 in 's-Gravenhage (Vissershaven neighbourhood). The home was built in 1934 and has 82 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label D. The nearest railway station is Grote Markt (3.5 km). The nearest primary school is Protestants Christelijke Basisschool De Oranjeschool (169 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted24 Jul 2026€ 395,000−€ 40,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 435,000
Property details
- Living area
- 82 m²
- Construction year
- 1934
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- D
- WOZ value
- € 280,000
- Ownership
- Municipal leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Vissershaven, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- Low share renewable0%
- Residents in 100m grid cellⓘ
- Very densely populated195 persons
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safetyⓘ
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.1154 score
- Distance to interchange stationⓘ
- Far away5.6 km
- Crimes per 1,000 residentsⓘ
- High crime87.8 per 1,000 residents
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)82.5%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)84.7%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)ⓘ
- Much building pressure47
- Permits <500 m (3 months)ⓘ
- Very high construction activity15
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)ⓘ
- Above the standardYes
- Number of risk sources within 1 kmⓘ
- Many sources6
- Shared plotⓘ
- Shared plotYes
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facilityⓘ
- Nearby (0.5-1 km)583 m
- Distance to military terrainⓘ
- Near military site1.1 km
- Within odour distance sewage treatment plantⓘ
- Within odour distance sewage treatment plantYes
- Within Wbb soil locationⓘ
- Within registered soil locationYes
- Capacity nearest WWTPⓘ
- Large treatment plant244,800 i.e.
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Above-average nuisance6.7%
- Noise loadⓘ
- Heavy61 dB
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)ⓘ
- Disturbing51 dB
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Multiple industrial businesses3
- Avg. natural gas consumptionⓘ
- Economical590 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values6.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂ⓘ
- Very low0.808 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facilityⓘ
- Far away44.7 km
- Distance to biomass plantⓘ
- At distance (>3 km)49.4 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbineⓘ
- Far away (>2 km)8.5 km
- Distance to railway lineⓘ
- Far from rail4.1 km
- Distance to nearest external safety facilityⓘ
- Well away6.2 km
- Distance to nearest high-voltage power lineⓘ
- Far from high voltage2.4 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
47 permits within 500 m · 11 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
28th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 364 pupils
Disadvantage score 80: more disadvantage than 95% of schools
94th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 273 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
16th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 8 pupils · total 71 pupils
Disadvantage score 24: more disadvantage than 65% of schools
77th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 100 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
98th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 231 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
92nd percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 215 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
95th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 227 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
98th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 238 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
99th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 236 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
99th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 401 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
20th percentile: low · 90% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 52 exam candidates
45th percentile: average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO · 22 exam candidates
28th percentile: average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 103 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
77th percentile: high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.5 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 87 exam candidates
99th percentile: high · 97% passed · CE avg 7.0 · VWO · 114 exam candidates
9th percentile: low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO · 116 exam candidates
34th percentile: average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 161 exam candidates
34th percentile: average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 142 exam candidates
24th percentile: low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 138 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.