Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
21/07/2026 | Willem Buytewechstraat 115 C Rotterdam | € 350.000 € 335.500 | -4.1% | 66 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Goudsesingel 270 C Rotterdam | € 275.000 € 260.000 | -5.5% | 45 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Ruisvoornpad 51 Hoogvliet Rotterdam | € 574.500 € 549.500 | -4.3% | 158 m²154 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Nieuwstraat 23 A Schiedam | € 395.000 € 374.000 | -5.3% | 97 m²40 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Rietdekker 25 Poortugaal | € 819.000 € 799.000 | -2.4% | 163 m²308 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Jan Wilspad 28 Rotterdam | € 565.000 € 550.000 | -2.6% | 124 m²151 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Alphons Ariënsstraat 186 Schiedam | € 349.500 € 325.000 | -7.0% | 75 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Hollandiahof 32 Schiedam | € 575.000 € 539.000 | -6.3% | 128 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Lagendijk 319 Ridderkerk | € 750.000 € 695.000 | -7.3% | 126 m²805 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Dirk Schäferplein 126 Schiedam | € 275.000 € 269.500 | -2.0% | 83 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Houtlaan 93 Rotterdam | € 1.250.000 € 1.200.000 | -4.0% | 132 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Oosteinde 74 C Rotterdam | € 367.000 € 340.000 | -7.4% | 65 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Bilderdijkstraat 16 Capelle aan den IJssel | € 535.000 € 515.000 | -3.7% | 127 m²182 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Stoutenburg 7 Rotterdam | € 478.000 € 460.000 | -3.8% | 99 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Lehárstraat 178 Capelle aan den IJssel | € 460.000 € 449.000 | -2.4% | 116 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Henegouwerlaan 25 A Rotterdam | € 395.000 € 375.000 | -5.1% | 115 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Schieweg 244 C02 Rotterdam | € 349.500 € 324.500 | -7.2% | 102 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Agata de Bruynkade 6 Rotterdam | € 1.495.000 € 1.449.000 | -3.1% | 171 m²461 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Watertorenweg 577 Rotterdam | € 419.000 € 400.000 | -4.5% | 83 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Kemperhof 59 Vlaardingen | € 619.000 € 599.000 | -3.2% | 142 m²126 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Willem Buytewechstraat 115 C
Apartment at Willem Buytewechstraat 115C in Rotterdam (Delfshaven neighbourhood). The home was built in 1928 and has 125 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Coolhaven (306 m). The nearest primary school is Delfshaven (174 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted21 Jul 2026€ 335,500−€ 14,500
- Sold10 Jun 2026€ 350,000
Property details
- Living area
- 125 m²
- Construction year
- 1928
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 429,000
- Ownership
- —
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Delfshaven, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Within impact zone of large industrial polluterⓘ
- Within impact zone of large polluterYes
- Capacity nearest WWTPⓘ
- Very large treatment plant423,000 i.e.
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Much neighbour nuisance8.4%
- Noise loadⓘ
- Loud69 dB
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)ⓘ
- Severely disruptive61 dB
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby23
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- Plan statusⓘ
- Finalfinal
- Avg. natural gas consumptionⓘ
- Economical560 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂ⓘ
- Very low1.133 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facilityⓘ
- Far away21.8 km
- Distance to biomass plantⓘ
- At distance (>3 km)25.6 km
- Distance to nearest emission sourceⓘ
- ample distance1.1 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbineⓘ
- Far away (>2 km)5.8 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
16 permits · 19 construction plans within 500 m · 35 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
21st percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 122 pupils
Disadvantage score 45 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
54th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 61 pupils · total 740 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
36th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 136 pupils
Disadvantage score 44 — more disadvantage than 81% of schools
34th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 347 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
11th percentile — low · DIA · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 172 pupils
Disadvantage score 69 — more disadvantage than 92% of schools
31st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 193 pupils
Disadvantage score 54 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
6th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 56 pupils · total 453 pupils
Disadvantage score 150 — more disadvantage than 100% of schools
11th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 154 pupils
Disadvantage score 46 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
40th percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 111 pupils
Disadvantage score 28 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
47th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 13 pupils · total 136 pupils
Disadvantage score 54 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
97th percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 103 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
93rd percentile — high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 108 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO
61st percentile — average · 98% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO · 53 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
65th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 35 exam candidates
98th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VWO · 176 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.