Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Willem de Zwijgerlaan 334 D14
Home at Willem de Zwijgerlaan 334 in Amsterdam (Bedrijventerrein Landlust neighbourhood). The home was built in 1959 and has 56 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label E. The nearest railway station is De Vlugtlaan (1.6 km). The nearest primary school is De Vindplaats (203 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted22 Jun 2026€ 350,000−€ 15,000
- Listed for sale2 Jun 2026€ 365,000
Property details
- Living area
- 56 m²
- Plot
- —
- Construction year
- 1959
- Property type
- Home
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- E
- WOZ value
- € 361,000
- Ownership
- Private property subject to leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Bedrijventerrein Landlust, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby25
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside35.5%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors31.9%
- Distance to business district
- Adjacent to business park0 m
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated140 persons
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safety
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.1185 score
- Leasehold or freehold
- FreeholdNo
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot2,015 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical490 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential14,037 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,003 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.627 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away5.1 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
23 permits · 2 construction plans within 500 m · 46 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
14th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 216 pupils
Disadvantage score 48 — more disadvantage than 84% of schools
56th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 11 pupils · total 110 pupils
Disadvantage score 22 — more disadvantage than 62% of schools
96th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 152 pupils
Disadvantage score 0 — more disadvantage than 0% of schools
75th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 272 pupils
Disadvantage score 15 — more disadvantage than 52% of schools
94th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 414 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
13th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 245 pupils
Disadvantage score 65 — more disadvantage than 91% of schools
51st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 161 pupils
Disadvantage score 41 — more disadvantage than 80% of schools
15th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 113 pupils
Disadvantage score 24 — more disadvantage than 64% of schools
37th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 226 pupils
Disadvantage score 27 — more disadvantage than 68% of schools
no recent test score · total 38 pupils
Disadvantage score 4 — more disadvantage than 24% of schools
10th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 94 exam candidates
1st percentile — low · 67% passed · CE avg 5.9 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 102 exam candidates
60th percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VWO · 111 exam candidates
19th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 70 exam candidates
43rd percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO · 35 exam candidates
18th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 99 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 52% passed · CE avg 5.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 33 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
35th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO/PRO · 93 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 61% passed · CE avg 5.5 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 89 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.