Price drops in and around Eindhoven
More homes in and around Eindhoven whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Willem de Zwijgerstraat 34
Terraced house at Willem de Zwijgerstraat 34 in Eindhoven (Eliasterrein, Vonderkwartier neighbourhood). The home was built in 1933 and has 163 m² of living space, a 110 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Eindhoven Stadion (830 m). The nearest primary school is Montessoribasisschool De Trinoom (419 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced23 Jul 2026€ 650,000−€ 50,000
- Listed for sale1 Jul 2026€ 700,000
Property details
- Living area
- 163 m²
- Plot
- 110 m²
- Construction year
- 1933
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 643,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Eliasterrein, Vonderkwartier, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated140 persons
- Catering within 300 m
- Very many catering businesses, nightlife area29
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure26
- Permits <500 m (3 months)
- Very high construction activity6
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.1%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress47 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby13
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby13
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island2.3 °C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside41.7%
- Number of risk sources within 1 km
- Many sources7
- Dual designation
- Archaeological protectionValue - Archaeology 5
- Number of soil surveys
- Soil survey registered3
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- One within 1 km1
- Distance to nearest emission source
- nearby485 m
- Distance to nearest external safety facility
- Nearby (within area of influence)922 m
- Distance to airport
- Nearby6.8 km
- Fine dust (PM2.5)
- Elevated10.2 µg/m³
- Estimated sun hours (winter)
- Virtually no winter sun0 hour
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)
- Elevated1.5%
- Borders overburden Natura 2000 area
- Borders congested areaYes
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar power
- Above average30%
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space98 m²
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential6,807 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield994 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.643 µg/m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
25 permits · 5 construction plans within 500 m · 45 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
49th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 56 pupils · total 539 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
99th percentile: high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 167 pupils
Disadvantage score 10: more disadvantage than 42% of schools
64th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 303 pupils
Disadvantage score 3: more disadvantage than 22% of schools
no recent test score · total 11 pupils
79th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 12 pupils · total 126 pupils
Disadvantage score 43: more disadvantage than 81% of schools
72nd percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 216 pupils
Disadvantage score 10: more disadvantage than 42% of schools
76th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 272 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
73rd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 52 pupils · total 966 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
32nd percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 13 pupils · total 138 pupils
Disadvantage score 42: more disadvantage than 81% of schools
22nd percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 384 pupils
Disadvantage score 11: more disadvantage than 45% of schools
no exam results · MAVO
31st percentile: average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 145 exam candidates
29th percentile: average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO/HAVO · 141 exam candidates
48th percentile: average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 23 exam candidates
6th percentile: low · 82% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 277 exam candidates
69th percentile: average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.6 · HAVO/VWO · 220 exam candidates
94th percentile: high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 116 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO
64th percentile: average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO · 118 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.