Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
25/07/2026 | Willem de Zwijgerstraat 63 A Rotterdam | € 395.000 € 365.000 | -7.6% | 93 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Wijnhaven 43 E Rotterdam | € 690.000 € 670.000 | -2.9% | 111 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Westerstraat 18 K Rotterdam | € 550.000 € 520.000 | -5.5% | 103 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | De Kempenaerstraat 33 B Rotterdam | € 425.000 € 399.500 | -6.0% | 104 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Churchillplein 118 Rotterdam | € 498.000 € 489.000 | -1.8% | 105 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | De Quackstraat 52 C Rotterdam | € 295.000 € 275.000 | -6.8% | 92 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Witte de Withstraat 19 C Rotterdam | € 389.000 € 349.000 | -10.3% | 65 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Mendelssohnplein 15 D Vlaardingen | € 289.000 € 279.500 | -3.3% | 86 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Van 's-Gravesandestraat 26 B Schiedam | € 300.000 € 299.000 | -0.3% | 99 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Slaghekstraat 75 D Rotterdam | € 335.000 € 325.000 | -3.0% | 99 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Baan 182 C02 Rotterdam | € 265.000 € 259.000 | -2.3% | 42 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Kleiweg 197 Rotterdam | € 850.000 € 799.000 | -6.0% | 176 m²75 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Kortebrantstraat 29 Rotterdam | € 360.000 € 345.000 | -4.2% | 63 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Berkelselaan 103 Rotterdam | € 425.000 € 422.000 | -0.7% | 90 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Maasboulevard 44 B Spijkenisse | € 425.000 € 399.900 | -5.9% | 118 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Aarhuispad 83 Rotterdam | € 350.000 € 325.000 | -7.1% | 95 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Reling 301 Barendrecht | € 330.000 € 325.000 | -1.5% | 74 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Dalkruid 2 Vlaardingen | € 459.000 € 439.000 | -4.4% | 103 m²107 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Noorderhavenkade 140 A03 Rotterdam | € 375.000 € 350.000 | -6.7% | 77 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Weizichtstraat 21 Rotterdam | € 340.000 € 320.000 | -5.9% | 85 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Willem de Zwijgerstraat 63 A
Terraced house at Willem de Zwijgerstraat 63 in Rotterdam (Overschie neighbourhood). The home was built in 1919 and has 102 m² of living space, a 69 m² plot, 3 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Schiedam Centrum (2.5 km). The nearest primary school is CBS De Regenboog (251 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced25 Jul 2026€ 365,000−€ 30,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 395,000
Property details
- Living area
- 102 m²
- Plot
- 69 m²
- Construction year
- 1919
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 306,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Overschie, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- Low share renewable0%
- Distance to interchange stationⓘ
- Far away5.2 km
- Children per primary school place (proxy)ⓘ
- Many children per place8.24 ratio
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)85.6%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)84.9%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)ⓘ
- Much building pressure8
- Secondary schools within 3 kmⓘ
- No secondary school within 3 km0.4
- Distance to airportⓘ
- Directly next to airport1.8 km
- Distance to motorwayⓘ
- Very close29 m
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby10
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 kmⓘ
- Much industry nearby7
- Environmental health risk (MGR)ⓘ
- High environmental health risk8.5%
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)ⓘ
- Above the standardYes
- Foundation riskⓘ
- High risklarge
- Average highest groundwater level (GHG)ⓘ
- Very high groundwater22 m above sea level
- Groundwater table (Gt)ⓘ
- Very wet (high groundwater level)IIa
- Flood risk classⓘ
- High flood risklarge
- Building coverage percentageⓘ
- Almost completely built up100%
- Unbuilt plot areaⓘ
- Almost completely built up0 m²
- Plot area (cadastral plot)ⓘ
- Small plot69 m²
- Distance to military terrainⓘ
- Near military site1.5 km
- Distance to main/through roadⓘ
- Right on main road29 m
- Distance to airport (incl. small)ⓘ
- Aerodrome nearby — slight aircraft noise possible1.8 km
- Serious noise nuisance from aircraft (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- High flight nuisance15.9%
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)ⓘ
- Disturbing51 dB
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)ⓘ
- Elevated1.4%
- Under flight path / in aviation noise zoneⓘ
- In air traffic noise zoneYes
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plotⓘ
- Own plotNo
- Usable roof area for solar panelsⓘ
- Ample roof space86 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)ⓘ
- Efficient (label A/B)148 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy labelⓘ
- EconomicalA
- Solar potential roofⓘ
- Very high potential6,065 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWpⓘ
- Excellent yield1,004 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂ⓘ
- Very low1.179 µg/m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
7 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 28 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
53rd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 409 pupils
Disadvantage score 1: more disadvantage than 11% of schools
2nd percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 171 pupils
Disadvantage score 47: more disadvantage than 83% of schools
72nd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 486 pupils
Disadvantage score 39: more disadvantage than 78% of schools
96th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 46 pupils · total 436 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
94th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 51 pupils · total 415 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
81st percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 400 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
80th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 186 pupils
Disadvantage score 10: more disadvantage than 41% of schools
13th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 34 pupils · total 231 pupils
Disadvantage score 73: more disadvantage than 94% of schools
28th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 348 pupils
Disadvantage score 86: more disadvantage than 96% of schools
11th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 11 pupils · total 121 pupils
Disadvantage score 31: more disadvantage than 73% of schools
34th percentile: average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 111 exam candidates
19th percentile: low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 129 exam candidates
1st percentile: low · 65% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 293 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
65th percentile: average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VWO · 71 exam candidates
13th percentile: low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 177 exam candidates
28th percentile: average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 145 exam candidates
9th percentile: low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.2 · HAVO/VWO · 178 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
47th percentile: average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 69 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.