Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Witte de Withstraat 19 C
Apartment at Witte de Withstraat 19 in Rotterdam (Cool neighbourhood). The home was built in 1951 and has 80 m² of living space, 1 bedroom and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Beurs (248 m). The nearest primary school is Rotterdamse Schoolvereniging (193 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted24 Jul 2026€ 349,000−€ 40,000
- Listed for sale27 May 2026€ 389,000
Property details
- Living area
- 80 m²
- Construction year
- 1951
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 1
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 409,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Cool, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safety
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.2531 score
- Hospitality within 25 m
- Hospitality within 25 m1
- Catering within 300 m
- Very many catering businesses, nightlife area93
- Crimes per 1,000 residents
- High crime476 per 1,000 residents
- Parking tariff
- Very high rate€ 6.42
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)81.9%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)80.6%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure39
- Permits <500 m (3 months)
- Very high construction activity14
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Very close (<500 m)150 m
- Distance to nearest emission source
- very nearby150 m
- Road traffic noise
- Strong nuisance20.9%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress43 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby17
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island2 °C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside29.1%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors33.2%
- Masts within 300 m
- Many transmission masts nearby5
- Foundation risk
- High risklarge
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)
- Deep (0.5–2 m)0.8 m
- Flood risk class
- High flood risklarge
- Shared plot
- Shared plotYes
- Share of homes with solar power
- Few solar panels1%
- Distance to nearest transmission mast
- Transmission mast nearby (<100 m)52 m
- Distance to airport
- Nearby5.3 km
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Above-average nuisance8%
- Fine dust (PM2.5)
- Elevated10.6 µg/m³
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)
- Disturbing52 dB
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)
- Elevated1.4%
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Multiple sources3
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Generous plot311 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)120 kWh/m²/yr
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical140 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low1.123 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away21 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)26.1 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)4.3 km
- Distance to overhead high-voltage line
- Well away5,521 m
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
35 permits within 500 m · 34 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
99th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 355 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
66th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 85 pupils · total 638 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
47th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 284 pupils
Disadvantage score 77: more disadvantage than 95% of schools
48th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 405 pupils
Disadvantage score 28: more disadvantage than 69% of schools
50th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 198 pupils
Disadvantage score 77: more disadvantage than 95% of schools
27th percentile: average · DIA · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 109 pupils
Disadvantage score 40: more disadvantage than 79% of schools
53rd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 201 pupils
Disadvantage score 23: more disadvantage than 63% of schools
31st percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 193 pupils
Disadvantage score 54: more disadvantage than 87% of schools
55th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 393 pupils
Disadvantage score 124: more disadvantage than 99% of schools
74th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 339 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
97th percentile: high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.8 · HAVO/VWO · 36 exam candidates
98th percentile: high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VWO · 176 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
no exam results · VWO
8th percentile: low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO · 55 exam candidates
48th percentile: average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.5 · HAVO/VWO · 170 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
5th percentile: low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO · 70 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.