Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Zeesluisweg 62 D
Apartment at Zeesluisweg 62D in 's-Gravenhage (Vissershaven neighbourhood). The home was built in 2024 and has 75 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A+. The nearest railway station is Grote Markt (3.8 km). The nearest primary school is Eben Haezerschool (658 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted22 Jul 2026€ 524,500−€ 35,500
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 560,000
Property details
- Living area
- 75 m²
- Construction year
- 2024
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A+
- WOZ value
- € 590,000
- Ownership
- Municipal leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Vissershaven, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress48 °C
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island1.9 °C
- Masts within 300 m
- Many transmission masts nearby7
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away5.6 km
- Distance to business district
- Adjacent to business park50 m
- Children per primary school place (proxy)
- Many children per place1.65 ratio
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot564 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions20 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)86 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA+
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical590 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values6.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.828 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away45 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)48.5 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
45 permits · 3 construction plans within 500 m · 9 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
77th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 100 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
28th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 364 pupils
Disadvantage score 80 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
92nd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 215 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
98th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 231 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
94th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 273 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
72nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 69 pupils · total 566 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
35th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 150 pupils
Disadvantage score 61 — more disadvantage than 90% of schools
99th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 236 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
16th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 8 pupils · total 71 pupils
Disadvantage score 24 — more disadvantage than 65% of schools
99th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 401 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
34th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 142 exam candidates
45th percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO · 22 exam candidates
20th percentile — low · 90% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 52 exam candidates
24th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 138 exam candidates
99th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 7.0 · VWO · 114 exam candidates
28th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 103 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
77th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.5 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 87 exam candidates
9th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO · 116 exam candidates
34th percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 161 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.