Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
24/07/2026 | Van Alkemadelaan 70 Den Haag | € 1.245.000 € 1.190.000 | -4.4% | 233 m²191 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Zwetstraat 60 Den Haag | € 260.000 € 250.000 | -3.9% | 50 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Thomsonlaan 206 Den Haag | € 550.000 € 495.000 | -10.0% | 122 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Rijswijkseweg 71 C Den Haag | € 369.000 € 349.000 | -5.4% | 94 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Zwartendijk 29 Monster | € 1.129.000 € 1.095.000 | -3.0% | 236 m²1015 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Pisuissestraat 75 Den Haag | € 420.000 € 400.000 | -4.8% | 112 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Louis Couperusplein 52 Den Haag | € 840.000 € 829.500 | -1.3% | 153 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Volmerlaan 4 F035 Rijswijk (ZH) | € 309.500 € 300.000 | -3.1% | 53 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Kerkweg 14 Pijnacker | € 400.000 € 379.000 | -5.3% | 103 m²182 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Mient 138 Den Haag | € 325.000 € 300.000 | -7.7% | 70 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Erasmusweg 1903 Den Haag | € 550.000 € 500.000 | -9.1% | 156 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Kaapstraat 80 Den Haag | € 285.000 € 275.000 | -3.5% | 82 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Buizerdlaan 213 Leidschendam | € 525.000 € 499.000 | -5.0% | 83 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Segbroeklaan 10 Den Haag | € 425.000 € 400.000 | -5.9% | 109 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Tollenspark 15 's-Gravenzande | € 770.000 € 750.000 | -2.6% | 156 m²213 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Van Loostraat 116 Den Haag | € 775.000 € 725.000 | -6.5% | 138 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | San Franciscosingel 10 Den Haag | € 850.000 € 800.000 | -5.9% | 199 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Zeesluisweg 62 D Den Haag | € 560.000 € 524.500 | -6.3% | 75 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Aart van der Leeuwlaan 84 Delft | € 370.000 € 360.000 | -2.7% | 104 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Newtonplein 21 A Den Haag | € 239.500 € 219.500 | -8.3% | 29 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Zwetstraat 60
Apartment at Zwetstraat 60 in 's-Gravenhage (Rivierenbuurt-Zuid neighbourhood). The home was built in 1926 and has 48 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Den Haag HS (541 m). The nearest primary school is Jan V Nassauschool voor Protestants Christelijk Basisonderwijs (180 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced24 Jul 2026€ 250,000−€ 10,000
- Listed for sale16 Jun 2026€ 260,000
Property details
- Living area
- 48 m²
- Construction year
- 1926
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 250,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Rivierenbuurt-Zuid, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- Low share renewable0%
- Share of households lowest 40% incomeⓘ
- strong concentration of low incomes74.8%
- Share of persons in povertyⓘ
- High poverty17.9%
- Severe loneliness (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- High20.3%
- Residents in 100m grid cellⓘ
- Very densely populated170 persons
- Livability Meter: physical environmentⓘ
- Unfavourable physical environment-0.0533 score
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safetyⓘ
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.1606 score
- High stress (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Much stress29.9%
- Distance to business districtⓘ
- Adjacent to business park27 m
- Crimes per 1,000 residentsⓘ
- High crime85.9 per 1,000 residents
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)69.3%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)71.2%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)ⓘ
- Much building pressure14
- Distance to railway lineⓘ
- Very close to railway89 m
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Much neighbour nuisance10.1%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress47 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby7
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Urban heat island effectⓘ
- Strong heat island2.6 °C
- Can find cooling outside the homeⓘ
- Few people find cooling outside28.9%
- Able to find cooling in the propertyⓘ
- Few people can cool off indoors29.8%
- Number of risk sources within 1 kmⓘ
- Many sources6
- Number of hazardous installations (REV) within 1 kmⓘ
- Cluster of risky facilities nearby5
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)ⓘ
- Deep (0.5–2 m)1.68 m
- Flood risk classⓘ
- High flood risklarge
- Shared plotⓘ
- Shared plotYes
- Share of homes with solar powerⓘ
- Few solar panels1%
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facilityⓘ
- Nearby (0.5-1 km)506 m
- Distance to nearest emission sourceⓘ
- nearby361 m
- Distance to military terrainⓘ
- Near military site0.9 km
- Distance to airportⓘ
- Nearby15 km
- Within Wbb soil locationⓘ
- Within registered soil locationYes
- Soil remediation registeredⓘ
- Remediation registeredYes
- Serious noise nuisance from trains (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Heavy train noise3.7%
- Industrial emitters within 2 kmⓘ
- Multiple sources5
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values6.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂ⓘ
- Very low0.879 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facilityⓘ
- Far away40.2 km
- Distance to biomass plantⓘ
- At distance (>3 km)46.1 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbineⓘ
- Far away (>2 km)4 km
- Distance to nearest transmission mastⓘ
- No transmitter mast in the neighbourhood430 m
- Distance to overhead high-voltage lineⓘ
- Well away1,789 m
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
12 permits · 2 construction plans within 500 m · 28 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
32nd percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 318 pupils
Disadvantage score 54: more disadvantage than 87% of schools
2nd percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 10 pupils · total 72 pupils
Disadvantage score 38: more disadvantage than 77% of schools
no recent test score · total 119 pupils
Disadvantage score 23: more disadvantage than 63% of schools
24th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 190 pupils
Disadvantage score 72: more disadvantage than 93% of schools
53rd percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 85 pupils · total 260 pupils
Disadvantage score 55: more disadvantage than 87% of schools
31st percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 175 pupils
Disadvantage score 51: more disadvantage than 85% of schools
no recent test score · total 62 pupils
Disadvantage score 0: more disadvantage than 7% of schools
80th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 50 pupils · total 419 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
52nd percentile: average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 191 pupils
Disadvantage score 53: more disadvantage than 86% of schools
20th percentile: low · DIA · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 265 pupils
Disadvantage score 98: more disadvantage than 98% of schools
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
90th percentile: high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.6 · HAVO/VWO · 6 exam candidates
52nd percentile: average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.5 · HAVO/VWO · 136 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · PRO
2nd percentile: low · 79% passed · CE avg 5.9 · VBO · 76 exam candidates
5th percentile: low · 79% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 130 exam candidates
75th percentile: average · 100% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/PRO · 12 exam candidates
22nd percentile: low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 225 exam candidates
61st percentile: average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 69 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.