Price drops in and around Amstelveen
More homes in and around Amstelveen whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Anna Blamanlaan 19
Apartment at Anna Blamanlaan 19 in Amstelveen (Schrijversbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1995 and has 87 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Schiphol Airport (5.9 km). The nearest primary school is Karel Eykman School (676 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted26 Jun 2026€ 500,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 525,000
Property details
- Living area
- 87 m²
- Construction year
- 1995
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 436,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Schrijversbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Average WOZ value (municipality)
- Well above national average€ 615,000
- Distance to nearest glasshouse horticulture
- Very close224 m
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High1.8%
- Glass horticulture area within 1 km
- Very many glasshouses (strong light nuisance)849,866 m²
- Greenhouse area within 1 km
- Large-scale greenhouse horticulture nearby85.04 ha
- Aircraft movements per hour (nearest airport)
- Very busy54.1 per hour
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away10.1 km
- Distance to train station
- Station very far away10.1 km
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated120 persons
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar power
- Above average36%
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)166 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalB
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values8.3%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.588 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away14.4 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)14.5 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
14 zoning plan amendments within 5 km.
Schools
85th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 79 pupils · total 486 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
96th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 104 pupils · total 706 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
20th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 10 pupils · total 175 pupils
Disadvantage score 22 — more disadvantage than 62% of schools
87th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 131 pupils
Disadvantage score 0 — more disadvantage than 6% of schools
61st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 52 pupils · total 395 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
90th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 423 pupils
Disadvantage score 5 — more disadvantage than 27% of schools
71st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 184 pupils
Disadvantage score 2 — more disadvantage than 18% of schools
93rd percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 57 pupils · total 413 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
51st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 295 pupils
Disadvantage score 23 — more disadvantage than 62% of schools
46th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 395 pupils
Disadvantage score 6 — more disadvantage than 31% of schools
25th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 298 exam candidates
47th percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.5 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 327 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · PRO
56th percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.6 · HAVO/VWO · 271 exam candidates
21st percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 164 exam candidates
57th percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.6 · HAVO/VWO · 262 exam candidates
59th percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO · 112 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
63rd percentile — average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 115 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.