Price drops in and around Heerlen
More homes in and around Heerlen whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Annie M.G. Schmidt-plantsoen 38
Terraced house at Annie M.G. Schmidt-plantsoen 38 in Heerlen (Dr Schaepmanplein en omgeving neighbourhood). The home was built in 2021 and has 120 m² of living space, a 163 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label A+. The nearest railway station is Landgraaf (1.7 km). The nearest primary school is El Wahda Islamitische Basisschool (474 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted27 Jun 2026€ 375,000−€ 20,000
- Listed for sale6 Jun 2026€ 395,000
Property details
- Living area
- 120 m²
- Plot
- 163 m²
- Construction year
- 2021
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- A+
- WOZ value
- € 331,000
- Ownership
- —
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Dr Schaepmanplein en omgeving, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable12%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance14.1%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.2%
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)
- High4.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.5%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress47 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby9
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside44.4%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Spacious plot93 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar power
- Above average30%
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions18 kg/m2/yr
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space88 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)99 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA+
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential6,272 kWh/yr
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
1 permit · 42 construction plans within 500 m · 23 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
46th percentile — average · DOE · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 276 pupils
Disadvantage score 61 — more disadvantage than 90% of schools
40th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 167 pupils
Disadvantage score 58 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
14th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 353 pupils
Disadvantage score 0 — more disadvantage than 5% of schools
42nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 423 pupils
Disadvantage score 8 — more disadvantage than 36% of schools
65th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 50 pupils · total 409 pupils
Disadvantage score 31 — more disadvantage than 73% of schools
60th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 274 pupils
Disadvantage score 94 — more disadvantage than 97% of schools
100th percentile — high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 241 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
91st percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 415 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
64th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 204 pupils
Disadvantage score 14 — more disadvantage than 49% of schools
66th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 352 pupils
Disadvantage score 37 — more disadvantage than 77% of schools
21st percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VWO · 62 exam candidates
41st percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 29 exam candidates
5th percentile — low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.1 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 102 exam candidates
19th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO/HAVO · 49 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO
100th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 7.1 · VBO · 33 exam candidates
99th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VBO · 19 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
11th percentile — low · 85% passed · CE avg 6.2 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 47 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.