Price drops in and around Landgraaf
More homes in and around Landgraaf whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Nieuwenhagerstraat 81
Terraced house at Nieuwenhagerstraat 81 in Landgraaf (Lauradorp neighbourhood). The home was built in 1930 and has 98 m² of living space, a 105 m² plot, 2 bedrooms and energy label D. The nearest railway station is Eygelshoven Markt (1.9 km). The nearest primary school is Openbare Basisschool De Speurneus (660 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced16 Jul 2026€ 189,000−€ 4,000
- For sale7 Jul 2026
- Sold (conditional)4 Jun 2026
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 193,000
Property details
- Living area
- 98 m²
- Plot
- 105 m²
- Construction year
- 1930
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- D
- WOZ value
- € 182,000
- Ownership
- —
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Lauradorp, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Soil standard exceeded
- Standard exceededYes
- Odour nuisance from wood burning (% seriously affected)
- High5.6%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby7
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Number of building plans within 500 m
- Much building activity52
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away6.2 km
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar power
- Many solar panels44%
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space84 m²
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential6,015 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,025 kWh/kWp/yr
- Average WOZ value (municipality)
- Far below national average€ 295,000
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11.3%
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.576 µg/m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
52 construction plans within 500 m · 8 zoning plan amendments within 5 km.
Schools
96th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 193 pupils
Disadvantage score 12 — more disadvantage than 46% of schools
66th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 236 pupils
Disadvantage score 11 — more disadvantage than 45% of schools
88th percentile — high · DIA · grade 8: 46 pupils · total 355 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
75th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 171 pupils
Disadvantage score 19 — more disadvantage than 59% of schools
42nd percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 287 pupils
Disadvantage score 31 — more disadvantage than 73% of schools
62nd percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 199 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 78% of schools
63rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 375 pupils
Disadvantage score 28 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
42nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 423 pupils
Disadvantage score 8 — more disadvantage than 36% of schools
65th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 50 pupils · total 409 pupils
Disadvantage score 31 — more disadvantage than 73% of schools
63rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 215 pupils
Disadvantage score 11 — more disadvantage than 45% of schools
24th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 278 exam candidates
78th percentile — high · 95% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 106 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO
99th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VBO · 19 exam candidates
100th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 7.1 · VBO · 33 exam candidates
15th percentile — low · 88% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 119 exam candidates
94th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 107 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.